Gossan Resources Ltd (GSS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Gossan Resources Ltd (GSS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.29x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-42.63K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$146.46K) in one year. See GSS free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Gossan Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Gossan Resources Ltd across 29 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Gossan Resources Ltd growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Gossan Resources Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Gossan Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Gossan Resources Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | CA$25.87K | CA$255.56K | ▲ +103.6% |
| 2024 | -2.78x | CA$-544.10K | CA$195.54K | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2023 | -5.18x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$244.31K | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2022 | -5.37x | CA$-2.12 Million | CA$394.90K | ▼ -393.9% |
| 2021 | -1.09x | CA$-298.23K | CA$274.36K | ▼ -314.3% |
| 2020 | -0.26x | CA$-66.68K | CA$254.16K | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2019 | -2.70x | CA$-416.43K | CA$154.25K | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2018 | -2.19x | CA$-754.03K | CA$343.60K | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2017 | -1.12x | CA$-280.64K | CA$251.40K | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2016 | -2.00x | CA$-300.05K | CA$150.13K | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2015 | -2.70x | CA$-343.89K | CA$127.41K | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2014 | -2.56x | CA$-300.99K | CA$117.51K | ▲ +73.3% |
| 2013 | -9.61x | CA$-888.97K | CA$92.49K | ▼ -540.5% |
| 2012 | -1.50x | CA$-517.83K | CA$345.09K | ▼ -121.3% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-444.44K | CA$655.34K | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2010 | -1.39x | CA$-518.45K | CA$372.06K | ▼ -674.9% |
| 2009 | -0.18x | CA$-47.64K | CA$264.93K | ▲ +94.5% |
| 2008 | -3.28x | CA$-588.47K | CA$179.32K | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2007 | -2.13x | CA$-472.24K | CA$221.83K | ▼ -3.2% |
| 2006 | -2.06x | CA$-357.80K | CA$173.52K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2005 | -12.17x | CA$-365.46K | CA$30.03K | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2004 | -19.86x | CA$-458.06K | CA$23.06K | ▼ -310.3% |
| 2003 | -4.84x | CA$-338.50K | CA$69.92K | ▼ -9957.0% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | CA$-10.05K | CA$208.82K | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2001 | -1.06x | CA$-95.81K | CA$90.13K | ▼ -307.4% |
| 2000 | 0.51x | CA$93.61K | CA$182.64K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 1999 | 1.00x | CA$99.45K | CA$99.15K | ▲ +189.6% |
| 1998 | -1.12x | CA$-25.58K | CA$22.85K | ▼ -106.7% |
| 1997 | 16.80x | CA$263.90K | CA$15.71K | — |