HPQ Silicon Resources Inc (HPQ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
HPQ Silicon Resources Inc (HPQ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.61x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.05 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$3.34 Million) in one year. See HPQ Silicon Resources Inc (HPQ) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
HPQ Silicon Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for HPQ Silicon Resources Inc across 26 annual periods. Also explore HPQ net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for HPQ Silicon Resources Inc (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for HPQ Silicon Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HPQ Silicon Resources Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.93x | CA$-3.11 Million | CA$3.34 Million | ▼ -375.5% |
| 2024 | -0.20x | CA$-1.69 Million | CA$8.66 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | CA$-1.26 Million | CA$7.23 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2022 | -0.69x | CA$-4.88 Million | CA$7.09 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2021 | -0.71x | CA$-2.41 Million | CA$3.39 Million | ▼ -251.8% |
| 2020 | -0.20x | CA$-1.05 Million | CA$5.17 Million | ▼ -30.6% |
| 2019 | -0.15x | CA$-668.43K | CA$4.32 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2018 | -0.79x | CA$-3.29 Million | CA$4.15 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2017 | -0.52x | CA$-1.44 Million | CA$2.77 Million | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2016 | -0.54x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$2.81 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-938.24K | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2014 | -0.65x | CA$-648.88K | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +25.8% |
| 2013 | -0.87x | CA$-723.72K | CA$828.15K | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2012 | -0.58x | CA$-405.31K | CA$695.37K | ▲ +52.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24x | CA$-533.42K | CA$431.44K | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2010 | -1.01x | CA$-187.48K | CA$186.16K | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2009 | -0.65x | CA$-74.81K | CA$115.30K | ▼ -331.2% |
| 2008 | 0.28x | CA$408.96K | CA$1.46 Million | ▲ +117.7% |
| 2007 | -1.59x | CA$-837.30K | CA$527.09K | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2006 | -3.09x | CA$-352.30K | CA$114.14K | ▼ -164.2% |
| 2005 | -1.17x | CA$-370.74K | CA$317.31K | ▼ -1310.3% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | CA$30.59K | CA$316.87K | ▲ +102.3% |
| 2003 | -4.18x | CA$-798.78K | CA$191.14K | ▼ -4378.9% |
| 2002 | -0.09x | CA$-11.28K | CA$120.86K | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2001 | -3.48x | CA$-233.05K | CA$66.89K | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2000 | -5.05x | CA$-319.58K | CA$63.28K | — |