Kutcho Copper Corp (KC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kutcho Copper Corp (KC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-380.40K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$31.23 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Kutcho Copper Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kutcho Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kutcho Copper Corp across 28 annual periods. Also explore KC year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kutcho Copper Corp (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kutcho Copper Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Kutcho Copper Corp (KC) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-637.27K | CA$29.40 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$28.82 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$25.99 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | CA$-2.53 Million | CA$40.02 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$37.22 Million | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | CA$-874.09K | CA$34.35 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-990.06K | CA$31.86 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-3.77 Million | CA$23.02 Million | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2017 | -2.47x | CA$-780.85K | CA$316.14K | ▼ -145.2% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | CA$-833.63K | CA$827.55K | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2015 | -1.28x | CA$-848.74K | CA$662.36K | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2014 | -0.68x | CA$-475.42K | CA$697.84K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2013 | -1.31x | CA$-593.98K | CA$452.95K | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -6.28x | CA$-596.15K | CA$94.96K | ▼ -598.9% |
| 2011 | -0.90x | CA$-68.37K | CA$76.12K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2010 | -14.56x | CA$-258.96K | CA$17.78K | ▼ -502.5% |
| 2009 | -2.42x | CA$-140.88K | CA$58.28K | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2008 | -8.41x | CA$-210.61K | CA$25.04K | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2007 | -17.12x | CA$-206.33K | CA$12.05K | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2006 | -8.19x | CA$-144.46K | CA$17.63K | ▼ -389.9% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | CA$-159.90K | CA$95.63K | ▼ -279.9% |
| 2004 | -0.44x | CA$-129.69K | CA$294.64K | ▼ -268.0% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-79.01K | CA$660.63K | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2002 | -0.55x | CA$-274.01K | CA$495.85K | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | CA$-186.12K | CA$438.76K | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2000 | -1.52x | CA$-349.10K | CA$229.87K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1999 | -2.66x | CA$-410.68K | CA$154.39K | ▼ -230.4% |
| 1998 | -0.81x | CA$-148.88K | CA$184.91K | — |