Kutcho Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kutcho Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kutcho Copper Corp (KC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-380.40K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$31.23 Million) in one year. Check KC capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kutcho Copper Corp (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kutcho Copper Corp from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kutcho Copper Corp across 28 annual periods. Check Kutcho Copper Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Kutcho Copper Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Kutcho Copper Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kutcho Copper Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KC cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | CA$-637.27K | CA$29.40 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2024 | -0.06x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$28.82 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$25.99 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | CA$-2.53 Million | CA$40.02 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$37.22 Million | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | CA$-874.09K | CA$34.35 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-990.06K | CA$31.86 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | CA$-3.77 Million | CA$23.02 Million | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2017 | -2.47x | CA$-780.85K | CA$316.14K | ▼ -145.2% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | CA$-833.63K | CA$827.55K | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2015 | -1.28x | CA$-848.74K | CA$662.36K | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2014 | -0.68x | CA$-475.42K | CA$697.84K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2013 | -1.31x | CA$-593.98K | CA$452.95K | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2012 | -6.28x | CA$-596.15K | CA$94.96K | ▼ -598.9% |
| 2011 | -0.90x | CA$-68.37K | CA$76.12K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2010 | -14.56x | CA$-258.96K | CA$17.78K | ▼ -502.5% |
| 2009 | -2.42x | CA$-140.88K | CA$58.28K | ▲ +71.3% |
| 2008 | -8.41x | CA$-210.61K | CA$25.04K | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2007 | -17.12x | CA$-206.33K | CA$12.05K | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2006 | -8.19x | CA$-144.46K | CA$17.63K | ▼ -389.9% |
| 2005 | -1.67x | CA$-159.90K | CA$95.63K | ▼ -279.9% |
| 2004 | -0.44x | CA$-129.69K | CA$294.64K | ▼ -268.0% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-79.01K | CA$660.63K | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2002 | -0.55x | CA$-274.01K | CA$495.85K | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2001 | -0.42x | CA$-186.12K | CA$438.76K | ▲ +72.1% |
| 2000 | -1.52x | CA$-349.10K | CA$229.87K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1999 | -2.66x | CA$-410.68K | CA$154.39K | ▼ -230.4% |
| 1998 | -0.81x | CA$-148.88K | CA$184.91K | — |