American Lithium Corp (LI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Lithium Corp (LI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.78x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.10 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.74 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of American Lithium Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Lithium Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Lithium Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore LI shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Lithium Corp (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Lithium Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see American Lithium Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.47x | CA$-23.23 Million | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2023 | -12.91x | CA$-24.40 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2022 | -4.99x | CA$-13.43 Million | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2021 | -5.86x | CA$-9.09 Million | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2020 | -4.30x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$651.32K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2019 | -10.19x | CA$-7.34 Million | CA$719.85K | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-966.06K | CA$325.87K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2017 | -17.57x | CA$-3.55 Million | CA$202.36K | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2016 | -4.83x | CA$-58.20K | CA$12.05K | ▼ -660.8% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | CA$-17.32K | CA$27.28K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2014 | -16.66x | CA$-236.88K | CA$14.22K | ▼ -4868.5% |
| 2013 | -0.34x | CA$-114.69K | CA$341.97K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2012 | -0.35x | CA$-83.03K | CA$240.30K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2011 | -0.59x | CA$-78.27K | CA$132.94K | ▲ +75.6% |
| 2010 | -2.41x | CA$-152.54K | CA$63.26K | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2009 | -5.45x | CA$-173.37K | CA$31.84K | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | -3.40x | CA$-101.10K | CA$29.74K | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2007 | -1.79x | CA$-98.94K | CA$55.27K | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2006 | -3.22x | CA$-85.09K | CA$26.44K | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2005 | -6.73x | CA$-82.12K | CA$12.20K | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2004 | -10.65x | CA$-87.36K | CA$8.20K | ▼ -2162.4% |
| 2003 | -0.47x | CA$-57.18K | CA$121.48K | ▼ -111.9% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | CA$-28.40K | CA$127.83K | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2001 | -0.32x | CA$-29.34K | CA$92.42K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | CA$-16.07K | CA$57.73K | — |