American Lithium Corp (LI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Lithium Corp (LI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.78x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.10 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.74 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of American Lithium Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
American Lithium Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for American Lithium Corp across 25 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of American Lithium Corp for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for American Lithium Corp (2000–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Lithium Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LI stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.47x | CA$-23.23 Million | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2023 | -12.91x | CA$-24.40 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2022 | -4.99x | CA$-13.43 Million | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2021 | -5.86x | CA$-9.09 Million | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2020 | -4.30x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$651.32K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2019 | -10.19x | CA$-7.34 Million | CA$719.85K | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-966.06K | CA$325.87K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2017 | -17.57x | CA$-3.55 Million | CA$202.36K | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2016 | -4.83x | CA$-58.20K | CA$12.05K | ▼ -660.8% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | CA$-17.32K | CA$27.28K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2014 | -16.66x | CA$-236.88K | CA$14.22K | ▼ -4868.5% |
| 2013 | -0.34x | CA$-114.69K | CA$341.97K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2012 | -0.35x | CA$-83.03K | CA$240.30K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2011 | -0.59x | CA$-78.27K | CA$132.94K | ▲ +75.6% |
| 2010 | -2.41x | CA$-152.54K | CA$63.26K | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2009 | -5.45x | CA$-173.37K | CA$31.84K | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | -3.40x | CA$-101.10K | CA$29.74K | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2007 | -1.79x | CA$-98.94K | CA$55.27K | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2006 | -3.22x | CA$-85.09K | CA$26.44K | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2005 | -6.73x | CA$-82.12K | CA$12.20K | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2004 | -10.65x | CA$-87.36K | CA$8.20K | ▼ -2162.4% |
| 2003 | -0.47x | CA$-57.18K | CA$121.48K | ▼ -111.9% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | CA$-28.40K | CA$127.83K | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2001 | -0.32x | CA$-29.34K | CA$92.42K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | CA$-16.07K | CA$57.73K | — |