American Lithium Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
American Lithium Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. American Lithium Corp (LI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.78x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.10 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.74 Million) in one year. Check American Lithium Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of American Lithium Corp (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of American Lithium Corp from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for American Lithium Corp across 25 annual periods. Check LI capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
American Lithium Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
American Lithium Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for American Lithium Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does American Lithium Corp generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -5.47x | CA$-23.23 Million | CA$4.25 Million | ▲ +57.6% |
| 2023 | -12.91x | CA$-24.40 Million | CA$1.89 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2022 | -4.99x | CA$-13.43 Million | CA$2.69 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2021 | -5.86x | CA$-9.09 Million | CA$1.55 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2020 | -4.30x | CA$-2.80 Million | CA$651.32K | ▲ +57.8% |
| 2019 | -10.19x | CA$-7.34 Million | CA$719.85K | ▼ -243.9% |
| 2018 | -2.96x | CA$-966.06K | CA$325.87K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2017 | -17.57x | CA$-3.55 Million | CA$202.36K | ▼ -263.6% |
| 2016 | -4.83x | CA$-58.20K | CA$12.05K | ▼ -660.8% |
| 2015 | -0.64x | CA$-17.32K | CA$27.28K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2014 | -16.66x | CA$-236.88K | CA$14.22K | ▼ -4868.5% |
| 2013 | -0.34x | CA$-114.69K | CA$341.97K | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2012 | -0.35x | CA$-83.03K | CA$240.30K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2011 | -0.59x | CA$-78.27K | CA$132.94K | ▲ +75.6% |
| 2010 | -2.41x | CA$-152.54K | CA$63.26K | ▲ +55.7% |
| 2009 | -5.45x | CA$-173.37K | CA$31.84K | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2008 | -3.40x | CA$-101.10K | CA$29.74K | ▼ -89.9% |
| 2007 | -1.79x | CA$-98.94K | CA$55.27K | ▲ +44.4% |
| 2006 | -3.22x | CA$-85.09K | CA$26.44K | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2005 | -6.73x | CA$-82.12K | CA$12.20K | ▲ +36.8% |
| 2004 | -10.65x | CA$-87.36K | CA$8.20K | ▼ -2162.4% |
| 2003 | -0.47x | CA$-57.18K | CA$121.48K | ▼ -111.9% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | CA$-28.40K | CA$127.83K | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2001 | -0.32x | CA$-29.34K | CA$92.42K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | CA$-16.07K | CA$57.73K | — |