Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp (LIT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp (LIT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.22x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.05 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.76 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp across 23 annual periods. Also explore Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp (2002–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Argentina Lithium & Energy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LIT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.74x | CA$-8.97 Million | CA$3.28 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2023 | -16.22x | CA$-96.52 Million | CA$5.95 Million | ▼ -445.5% |
| 2022 | -2.97x | CA$-5.74 Million | CA$1.93 Million | ▼ -82.8% |
| 2021 | -1.63x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$976.50K | ▼ -134.3% |
| 2020 | -0.69x | CA$-212.94K | CA$306.68K | ▼ -110.9% |
| 2019 | -0.33x | CA$-270.24K | CA$820.72K | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2018 | -7.03x | CA$-3.64 Million | CA$518.35K | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2017 | -9.19x | CA$-2.45 Million | CA$267.05K | ▼ -421.6% |
| 2016 | -1.76x | CA$-312.32K | CA$177.23K | ▼ -478.5% |
| 2015 | -0.30x | CA$-29.57K | CA$97.06K | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2014 | -0.82x | CA$-44.94K | CA$54.55K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2013 | -6.59x | CA$-108.98K | CA$16.53K | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2012 | -27.17x | CA$-470.93K | CA$17.33K | ▼ -334.7% |
| 2011 | -6.25x | CA$-148.58K | CA$23.77K | ▲ +92.9% |
| 2010 | -87.46x | CA$-796.47K | CA$9.11K | ▼ -11968.8% |
| 2009 | -0.72x | CA$-363.45K | CA$501.55K | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2008 | -4.28x | CA$-2.38 Million | CA$555.19K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2007 | -14.68x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$119.09K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2006 | -7.55x | CA$-1.35 Million | CA$178.76K | ▼ -98.4% |
| 2005 | -3.81x | CA$-1.13 Million | CA$297.16K | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2004 | -16.77x | CA$-845.99K | CA$50.45K | ▼ -2299.7% |
| 2003 | -0.70x | CA$-80.61K | CA$115.35K | ▼ -306.1% |
| 2002 | -0.17x | CA$-4.03K | CA$23.43K | — |