Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$701.11K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.24 Million) in one year. See Lomiko Metals Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lomiko Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lomiko Metals Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore LMR shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lomiko Metals Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lomiko Metals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lomiko Metals Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.65x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$963.19K | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2024 | -2.02x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$682.39K | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2023 | -3.08x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$573.21K | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2022 | -2.05x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2021 | -3.70x | CA$-1.85 Million | CA$500.75K | ▼ -257.1% |
| 2020 | -1.04x | CA$-470.19K | CA$453.81K | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2019 | -1.94x | CA$-637.37K | CA$329.04K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2018 | -6.35x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$215.37K | ▼ -12101.8% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | CA$23.70 Million | CA$448.13 Million | ▲ +103.3% |
| 2017 | -1.60x | CA$-696.65K | CA$434.17K | ▼ -2308.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$28.38 Million | CA$390.63 Million | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2016 | -1.64x | CA$-753.00K | CA$460.24K | ▼ -2585.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$378.39 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 2015 | -4.14x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$308.51K | ▼ -11027.1% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$14.79 Million | CA$390.09 Million | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2014 | -1.87x | CA$-836.24K | CA$447.92K | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2013 | -0.85x | CA$-249.50K | CA$293.51K | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2012 | -10.22x | CA$-655.32K | CA$64.10K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2011 | -10.01x | CA$-481.46K | CA$48.08K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2010 | -15.89x | CA$-630.51K | CA$39.67K | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2009 | -38.18x | CA$-427.19K | CA$11.19K | ▼ -178.9% |
| 2008 | -13.69x | CA$-173.75K | CA$12.69K | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2007 | -34.15x | CA$-252.99K | CA$7.41K | ▼ -1523.4% |
| 2006 | -2.10x | CA$-309.76K | CA$147.27K | ▼ -328.2% |
| 2005 | 0.92x | CA$627.31K | CA$680.64K | ▲ +969.1% |
| 2004 | -0.11x | CA$-149.89K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-197.68K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2002 | -0.55x | CA$-696.76K | CA$1.27 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2001 | -1.32x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 1999 | -0.90x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▼ -350.0% |
| 1998 | -0.20x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-700.00K | CA$1.50 Million | — |