Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.34x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.57 Million) in one year. See Lomiko Metals Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lomiko Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lomiko Metals Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lomiko Metals Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lomiko Metals Inc. Check Lomiko Metals Inc (LMR) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.65x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$963.19K | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2024 | -2.02x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$682.39K | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2023 | -3.08x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$573.21K | ▼ -49.9% |
| 2022 | -2.05x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$1.18 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2021 | -3.70x | CA$-1.85 Million | CA$500.75K | ▼ -257.1% |
| 2020 | -1.04x | CA$-470.19K | CA$453.81K | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2019 | -1.94x | CA$-637.37K | CA$329.04K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 2018 | -6.35x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$215.37K | ▼ -12101.8% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | CA$23.70 Million | CA$448.13 Million | ▲ +103.3% |
| 2017 | -1.60x | CA$-696.65K | CA$434.17K | ▼ -2308.9% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$28.38 Million | CA$390.63 Million | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2016 | -1.64x | CA$-753.00K | CA$460.24K | ▼ -2585.4% |
| 2015 | 0.07x | CA$24.91 Million | CA$378.39 Million | ▲ +101.6% |
| 2015 | -4.14x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$308.51K | ▼ -11027.1% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | CA$14.79 Million | CA$390.09 Million | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2014 | -1.87x | CA$-836.24K | CA$447.92K | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2013 | -0.85x | CA$-249.50K | CA$293.51K | ▲ +91.7% |
| 2012 | -10.22x | CA$-655.32K | CA$64.10K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2011 | -10.01x | CA$-481.46K | CA$48.08K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2010 | -15.89x | CA$-630.51K | CA$39.67K | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2009 | -38.18x | CA$-427.19K | CA$11.19K | ▼ -178.9% |
| 2008 | -13.69x | CA$-173.75K | CA$12.69K | ▲ +59.9% |
| 2007 | -34.15x | CA$-252.99K | CA$7.41K | ▼ -1523.4% |
| 2006 | -2.10x | CA$-309.76K | CA$147.27K | ▼ -328.2% |
| 2005 | 0.92x | CA$627.31K | CA$680.64K | ▲ +969.1% |
| 2004 | -0.11x | CA$-149.89K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | CA$-197.68K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2002 | -0.55x | CA$-696.76K | CA$1.27 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2001 | -1.32x | CA$-1.58 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2000 | -1.18x | CA$-1.38 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -31.1% |
| 1999 | -0.90x | CA$-1.80 Million | CA$2.00 Million | ▼ -350.0% |
| 1998 | -0.20x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.00 Million | ▲ +57.1% |
| 1997 | -0.47x | CA$-700.00K | CA$1.50 Million | — |