Lumina Gold Corp (LUM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lumina Gold Corp (LUM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-4.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$77.04 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Lumina Gold Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Lumina Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Lumina Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Lumina Gold Corp for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Lumina Gold Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lumina Gold Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Lumina Gold Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.29x | CA$-17.78 Million | CA$62.18 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2023 | -0.52x | CA$-15.51 Million | CA$29.96 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2022 | -1.92x | CA$-20.24 Million | CA$10.56 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2021 | -8.58x | CA$-6.11 Million | CA$712.69K | ▼ -100.1% |
| 2020 | -4.29x | CA$-6.85 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2019 | -10.27x | CA$-14.78 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2018 | -24.86x | CA$-13.69 Million | CA$550.45K | ▼ -143.2% |
| 2017 | -10.22x | CA$-11.64 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -108.9% |
| 2016 | -4.89x | CA$-3.07 Million | CA$627.98K | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2015 | -71.07x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$38.61K | ▼ -1306.7% |
| 2014 | -5.05x | CA$-1.95 Million | CA$385.68K | ▼ -399.4% |
| 2013 | -1.01x | CA$-248.31K | CA$245.44K | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2012 | -2.35x | CA$-417.24K | CA$177.39K | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2011 | -1.33x | CA$-779.96K | CA$585.37K | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2010 | -1.32x | CA$-174.43K | CA$132.40K | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2009 | -0.67x | CA$-111.40K | CA$165.22K | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2008 | -2.85x | CA$-465.42K | CA$163.45K | ▼ -919.6% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | CA$-81.94K | CA$293.43K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2006 | -2.23x | CA$-322.10K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2005 | -2.11x | CA$-193.66K | CA$91.57K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-193.46K | CA$73.18K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2003 | -1.49x | CA$-129.25K | CA$86.96K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2002 | -3.97x | CA$-175.68K | CA$44.27K | ▼ -388.6% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | CA$-56.94K | CA$70.12K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | CA$-35.30K | CA$59.77K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | CA$-86.16K | CA$75.72K | — |