Lumina Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lumina Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lumina Gold Corp (LUM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-4.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$77.04 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Lumina Gold Corp reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lumina Gold Corp (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lumina Gold Corp from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lumina Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. Check LUM cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Lumina Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Lumina Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lumina Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lumina Gold Corp (LUM) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.29x | CA$-17.78 Million | CA$62.18 Million | ▲ +44.8% |
| 2023 | -0.52x | CA$-15.51 Million | CA$29.96 Million | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2022 | -1.92x | CA$-20.24 Million | CA$10.56 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2021 | -8.58x | CA$-6.11 Million | CA$712.69K | ▼ -100.1% |
| 2020 | -4.29x | CA$-6.85 Million | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +58.3% |
| 2019 | -10.27x | CA$-14.78 Million | CA$1.44 Million | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2018 | -24.86x | CA$-13.69 Million | CA$550.45K | ▼ -143.2% |
| 2017 | -10.22x | CA$-11.64 Million | CA$1.14 Million | ▼ -108.9% |
| 2016 | -4.89x | CA$-3.07 Million | CA$627.98K | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2015 | -71.07x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$38.61K | ▼ -1306.7% |
| 2014 | -5.05x | CA$-1.95 Million | CA$385.68K | ▼ -399.4% |
| 2013 | -1.01x | CA$-248.31K | CA$245.44K | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2012 | -2.35x | CA$-417.24K | CA$177.39K | ▼ -76.5% |
| 2011 | -1.33x | CA$-779.96K | CA$585.37K | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2010 | -1.32x | CA$-174.43K | CA$132.40K | ▼ -95.4% |
| 2009 | -0.67x | CA$-111.40K | CA$165.22K | ▲ +76.3% |
| 2008 | -2.85x | CA$-465.42K | CA$163.45K | ▼ -919.6% |
| 2007 | -0.28x | CA$-81.94K | CA$293.43K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2006 | -2.23x | CA$-322.10K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2005 | -2.11x | CA$-193.66K | CA$91.57K | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2004 | -2.64x | CA$-193.46K | CA$73.18K | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2003 | -1.49x | CA$-129.25K | CA$86.96K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2002 | -3.97x | CA$-175.68K | CA$44.27K | ▼ -388.6% |
| 2001 | -0.81x | CA$-56.94K | CA$70.12K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2000 | -0.59x | CA$-35.30K | CA$59.77K | ▲ +48.1% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | CA$-86.16K | CA$75.72K | — |