Mako Mining Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mako Mining Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mako Mining Corp (MKO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$19.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$99.89 Million) in one year. Check MKO cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mako Mining Corp (2004–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mako Mining Corp from 2004 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mako Mining Corp across 21 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Mako Mining Corp reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mako Mining Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2004–2025)
Mako Mining Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2004 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mako Mining Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mako Mining Corp (MKO) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.92x | CA$52.98 Million | CA$57.71 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2024 | 1.14x | CA$34.45 Million | CA$30.16 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2023 | 0.59x | CA$12.47 Million | CA$21.18 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2022 | 0.52x | CA$16.38 Million | CA$31.50 Million | ▲ +10908.5% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | CA$137.00K | CA$29.00 Million | ▲ +101.7% |
| 2020 | -0.28x | CA$-9.13 Million | CA$32.52 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | CA$-6.85 Million | CA$27.57 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2017 | -0.49x | CA$-674.87K | CA$1.37 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2016 | -0.31x | CA$-438.71K | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2015 | -0.42x | CA$-428.67K | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2014 | -2.22x | CA$-861.98K | CA$387.87K | ▼ -278.5% |
| 2013 | -0.59x | CA$-541.57K | CA$922.43K | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2012 | -0.69x | CA$-686.84K | CA$988.97K | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2011 | -0.64x | CA$-609.85K | CA$954.51K | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2010 | -1.77x | CA$-390.14K | CA$219.99K | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2009 | -4.62x | CA$-276.09K | CA$59.82K | ▲ +48.6% |
| 2008 | -8.99x | CA$-249.61K | CA$27.78K | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2007 | -5.89x | CA$-405.75K | CA$68.87K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2006 | -6.66x | CA$-430.13K | CA$64.57K | ▼ -149.5% |
| 2005 | -2.67x | CA$-238.40K | CA$89.27K | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2004 | -13.91x | CA$-119.67K | CA$8.60K | — |