Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.60 Million) in one year. See Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nicola Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nicola Mining Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore NIM net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nicola Mining Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nicola Mining Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.16x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$20.47 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$3.31 Million | CA$19.44 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$16.51 Million | ▲ +154.5% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$11.15 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$10.12 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | CA$-3.71 Million | CA$15.40 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$16.12 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2016 | -0.15x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$15.99 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$13.01 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-2.68 Million | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.58 Million | CA$30.44 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-7.53 Million | CA$19.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2011 | -0.48x | CA$-6.54 Million | CA$13.54 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2010 | -5.59x | CA$-427.16K | CA$76.39K | ▼ -221.3% |
| 2009 | -1.74x | CA$-134.97K | CA$77.54K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2008 | -3.27x | CA$-245.71K | CA$75.25K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2007 | -5.27x | CA$-319.16K | CA$60.58K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2006 | -6.88x | CA$-255.72K | CA$37.16K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2005 | -7.64x | CA$-96.32K | CA$12.60K | ▼ -133.6% |
| 2004 | -3.27x | CA$-26.90K | CA$8.22K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2003 | -9.07x | CA$-18.15K | CA$2.00K | ▼ -757.4% |
| 2002 | -1.06x | CA$-11.86K | CA$11.20K | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2001 | -5.60x | CA$-13.24K | CA$2.36K | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2000 | -6.85x | CA$-15.37K | CA$2.24K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1999 | -5.79x | CA$-9.70K | CA$1.68K | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1998 | -8.99x | CA$-16.12K | CA$1.79K | ▼ -1445.8% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-18.69K | CA$32.13K | — |