Nicola Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nicola Mining Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.60 Million) in one year. Check how high is Nicola Mining Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nicola Mining Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nicola Mining Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nicola Mining Inc across 28 annual periods. Check NIM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Nicola Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Nicola Mining Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nicola Mining Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.16x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$20.47 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$3.31 Million | CA$19.44 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$16.51 Million | ▲ +154.5% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$11.15 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$10.12 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | CA$-3.71 Million | CA$15.40 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$16.12 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2016 | -0.15x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$15.99 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$13.01 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-2.68 Million | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.58 Million | CA$30.44 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-7.53 Million | CA$19.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2011 | -0.48x | CA$-6.54 Million | CA$13.54 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2010 | -5.59x | CA$-427.16K | CA$76.39K | ▼ -221.3% |
| 2009 | -1.74x | CA$-134.97K | CA$77.54K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2008 | -3.27x | CA$-245.71K | CA$75.25K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2007 | -5.27x | CA$-319.16K | CA$60.58K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2006 | -6.88x | CA$-255.72K | CA$37.16K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2005 | -7.64x | CA$-96.32K | CA$12.60K | ▼ -133.6% |
| 2004 | -3.27x | CA$-26.90K | CA$8.22K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2003 | -9.07x | CA$-18.15K | CA$2.00K | ▼ -757.4% |
| 2002 | -1.06x | CA$-11.86K | CA$11.20K | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2001 | -5.60x | CA$-13.24K | CA$2.36K | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2000 | -6.85x | CA$-15.37K | CA$2.24K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1999 | -5.79x | CA$-9.70K | CA$1.68K | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1998 | -8.99x | CA$-16.12K | CA$1.79K | ▼ -1445.8% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-18.69K | CA$32.13K | — |