Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nicola Mining Inc (NIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$17.60 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Nicola Mining Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nicola Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nicola Mining Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Nicola Mining Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nicola Mining Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nicola Mining Inc. Check NIM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.16x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$20.47 Million | ▼ -195.1% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | CA$3.31 Million | CA$19.44 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | CA$1.73 Million | CA$16.51 Million | ▲ +154.5% |
| 2021 | -0.19x | CA$-2.22 Million | CA$11.52 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$11.15 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 2019 | -0.16x | CA$-1.66 Million | CA$10.12 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2018 | -0.24x | CA$-3.71 Million | CA$15.40 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | CA$-2.15 Million | CA$16.12 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2016 | -0.15x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$15.99 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | CA$-1.59 Million | CA$13.01 Million | ▲ +32.5% |
| 2014 | -0.18x | CA$-2.68 Million | CA$14.80 Million | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | CA$-3.58 Million | CA$30.44 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-7.53 Million | CA$19.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2011 | -0.48x | CA$-6.54 Million | CA$13.54 Million | ▲ +91.4% |
| 2010 | -5.59x | CA$-427.16K | CA$76.39K | ▼ -221.3% |
| 2009 | -1.74x | CA$-134.97K | CA$77.54K | ▲ +46.7% |
| 2008 | -3.27x | CA$-245.71K | CA$75.25K | ▲ +38.0% |
| 2007 | -5.27x | CA$-319.16K | CA$60.58K | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2006 | -6.88x | CA$-255.72K | CA$37.16K | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2005 | -7.64x | CA$-96.32K | CA$12.60K | ▼ -133.6% |
| 2004 | -3.27x | CA$-26.90K | CA$8.22K | ▲ +63.9% |
| 2003 | -9.07x | CA$-18.15K | CA$2.00K | ▼ -757.4% |
| 2002 | -1.06x | CA$-11.86K | CA$11.20K | ▲ +81.1% |
| 2001 | -5.60x | CA$-13.24K | CA$2.36K | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2000 | -6.85x | CA$-15.37K | CA$2.24K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 1999 | -5.79x | CA$-9.70K | CA$1.68K | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1998 | -8.99x | CA$-16.12K | CA$1.79K | ▼ -1445.8% |
| 1997 | -0.58x | CA$-18.69K | CA$32.13K | — |