Noble Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Noble Mineral Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Noble Mineral Exploration Inc (NOB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.60x as of May 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-943.82K could theoretically repay -3% of its total liabilities (CA$363.60K) in one year. Check Noble Mineral Exploration Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Noble Mineral Exploration Inc (2000–2023)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Noble Mineral Exploration Inc from 2000 to 2023. Historical debt coverage capacity for Noble Mineral Exploration Inc across 20 annual periods. Check Noble Mineral Exploration Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Noble Mineral Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2023)
Noble Mineral Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2023. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NOB cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -2.85x | CA$-1.17 Million | CA$410.31K | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2022 | -1.45x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$738.25K | ▼ -120.3% |
| 2021 | -0.66x | CA$-581.33K | CA$883.89K | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2020 | -0.60x | CA$-583.55K | CA$964.91K | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2019 | -1.82x | CA$-663.62K | CA$363.69K | ▼ -174.3% |
| 2018 | -0.67x | CA$-716.62K | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -557.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-207.14K | CA$2.05 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | CA$-155.21K | CA$2.77 Million | ▼ -121793.5% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | CA$-97.72 | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$-792.32 | CA$2.09 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2013 | -0.17x | CA$-998.76K | CA$5.90 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2008 | -4.08x | CA$-1.81 Million | CA$443.57K | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2007 | -6.02x | CA$-960.77K | CA$159.63K | ▼ -850.0% |
| 2006 | -0.63x | CA$-237.56K | CA$374.94K | ▼ -658.6% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | CA$-55.25K | CA$661.53K | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2004 | -0.40x | CA$-255.45K | CA$635.97K | ▼ -1958.5% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | CA$82.21K | CA$3.80 Million | ▲ +171.9% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | CA$-4.72K | CA$157.07K | ▲ +92.6% |
| 2001 | -0.41x | CA$-56.08K | CA$137.56K | ▼ -174.1% |
| 2000 | 0.55x | CA$99.18K | CA$180.36K | — |