Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of March 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.28K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$408.34K) in one year. Explore Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd across 26 annual periods. Also explore how large is Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NZP stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.86x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$400.13K | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2024 | -3.72x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$408.34K | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2023 | -2.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$578.82K | ▼ -238.0% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | CA$-802.87K | CA$1.05 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2021 | -8.99x | CA$-767.55K | CA$85.41K | ▼ -307.6% |
| 2020 | -2.21x | CA$-459.13K | CA$208.22K | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2019 | -12.50x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$82.49K | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2018 | -9.19x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$263.23K | ▼ -821.1% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.30 Million | ▼ -804.2% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-194.00K | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.59x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2012 | -1.50x | CA$-934.00K | CA$623.00K | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | CA$-717.00K | CA$1.16 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-270.00K | CA$744.00K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2009 | -1.24x | CA$-947.00K | CA$763.00K | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2008 | -1.01x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$2.16 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | -0.97x | CA$-332.00K | CA$343.00K | ▼ -57.7% |
| 2004 | -0.61x | CA$-39.75K | CA$64.75K | ▼ -214.0% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | CA$403.30K | CA$748.79K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.62x | CA$595.65K | CA$965.34K | ▲ +10283.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$8.77K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$43.01K | CA$1.76 Million | ▲ +125.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | CA$-195.24K | CA$2.05 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-413.24K | CA$4.03 Million | — |