Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of March 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.28K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$408.34K) in one year. See Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd. Check earnings quality score of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.86x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$400.13K | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2024 | -3.72x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$408.34K | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2023 | -2.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$578.82K | ▼ -238.0% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | CA$-802.87K | CA$1.05 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2021 | -8.99x | CA$-767.55K | CA$85.41K | ▼ -307.6% |
| 2020 | -2.21x | CA$-459.13K | CA$208.22K | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2019 | -12.50x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$82.49K | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2018 | -9.19x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$263.23K | ▼ -821.1% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.30 Million | ▼ -804.2% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-194.00K | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.59x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2012 | -1.50x | CA$-934.00K | CA$623.00K | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | CA$-717.00K | CA$1.16 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-270.00K | CA$744.00K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2009 | -1.24x | CA$-947.00K | CA$763.00K | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2008 | -1.01x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$2.16 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | -0.97x | CA$-332.00K | CA$343.00K | ▼ -57.7% |
| 2004 | -0.61x | CA$-39.75K | CA$64.75K | ▼ -214.0% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | CA$403.30K | CA$748.79K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.62x | CA$595.65K | CA$965.34K | ▲ +10283.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$8.77K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$43.01K | CA$1.76 Million | ▲ +125.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | CA$-195.24K | CA$2.05 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-413.24K | CA$4.03 Million | — |