Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of March 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.28K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$408.34K) in one year. See Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd across 26 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.86x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$400.13K | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2024 | -3.72x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$408.34K | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2023 | -2.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$578.82K | ▼ -238.0% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | CA$-802.87K | CA$1.05 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2021 | -8.99x | CA$-767.55K | CA$85.41K | ▼ -307.6% |
| 2020 | -2.21x | CA$-459.13K | CA$208.22K | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2019 | -12.50x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$82.49K | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2018 | -9.19x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$263.23K | ▼ -821.1% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.30 Million | ▼ -804.2% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-194.00K | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.59x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2012 | -1.50x | CA$-934.00K | CA$623.00K | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | CA$-717.00K | CA$1.16 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-270.00K | CA$744.00K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2009 | -1.24x | CA$-947.00K | CA$763.00K | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2008 | -1.01x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$2.16 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | -0.97x | CA$-332.00K | CA$343.00K | ▼ -57.7% |
| 2004 | -0.61x | CA$-39.75K | CA$64.75K | ▼ -214.0% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | CA$403.30K | CA$748.79K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.62x | CA$595.65K | CA$965.34K | ▲ +10283.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$8.77K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$43.01K | CA$1.76 Million | ▲ +125.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | CA$-195.24K | CA$2.05 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-413.24K | CA$4.03 Million | — |