Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (NZP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.35x as of March 2024, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.28K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$408.34K) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd across 26 annual periods. Check NZP cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Chatham Rock Phosphate Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.86x | CA$-1.14 Million | CA$400.13K | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2024 | -3.72x | CA$-1.52 Million | CA$408.34K | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2023 | -2.59x | CA$-1.50 Million | CA$578.82K | ▼ -238.0% |
| 2022 | -0.76x | CA$-802.87K | CA$1.05 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2021 | -8.99x | CA$-767.55K | CA$85.41K | ▼ -307.6% |
| 2020 | -2.21x | CA$-459.13K | CA$208.22K | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2019 | -12.50x | CA$-1.03 Million | CA$82.49K | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2018 | -9.19x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$263.23K | ▼ -821.1% |
| 2017 | -1.00x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$1.30 Million | ▼ -804.2% |
| 2016 | -0.11x | CA$-200.00K | CA$1.81 Million | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2015 | -0.15x | CA$-194.00K | CA$1.30 Million | ▲ +83.4% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | CA$-1.68 Million | CA$1.87 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2013 | -0.59x | CA$-1.71 Million | CA$2.90 Million | ▲ +60.7% |
| 2012 | -1.50x | CA$-934.00K | CA$623.00K | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2011 | -0.62x | CA$-717.00K | CA$1.16 Million | ▼ -70.6% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-270.00K | CA$744.00K | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2009 | -1.24x | CA$-947.00K | CA$763.00K | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2008 | -1.01x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$2.16 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | -0.97x | CA$-332.00K | CA$343.00K | ▼ -57.7% |
| 2004 | -0.61x | CA$-39.75K | CA$64.75K | ▼ -214.0% |
| 2002 | 0.54x | CA$403.30K | CA$748.79K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2001 | 0.62x | CA$595.65K | CA$965.34K | ▲ +10283.6% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | CA$8.77K | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -75.7% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | CA$43.01K | CA$1.76 Million | ▲ +125.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | CA$-195.24K | CA$2.05 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-413.24K | CA$4.03 Million | — |