Osisko Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Osisko Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Osisko Metals Inc (OM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.04x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$83.54 Million) in one year. Check OM cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Osisko Metals Inc (2003–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Osisko Metals Inc from 2003 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Osisko Metals Inc across 22 annual periods. Check Osisko Metals Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Osisko Metals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2003–2024)
Osisko Metals Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2003 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Osisko Metals Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Osisko Metals Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.03x | CA$-2.42 Million | CA$73.85 Million | ▲ +62.1% |
| 2023 | -0.09x | CA$-3.43 Million | CA$39.76 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2022 | -0.17x | CA$-3.38 Million | CA$19.40 Million | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2021 | -0.36x | CA$-2.59 Million | CA$7.15 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 2020 | -0.29x | CA$-1.64 Million | CA$5.62 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$10.07 Million | ▲ +69.2% |
| 2018 | -0.58x | CA$-5.93 Million | CA$10.26 Million | ▼ -239.0% |
| 2017 | -0.17x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$6.80 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2016 | -0.56x | CA$-590.50K | CA$1.05 Million | ▼ -1074.4% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$70.54K | CA$1.22 Million | ▲ +168.9% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | CA$-124.73K | CA$1.48 Million | ▲ +87.0% |
| 2013 | -0.65x | CA$-910.79K | CA$1.41 Million | ▼ -386.6% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | CA$405.58K | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +170.2% |
| 2011 | -0.32x | CA$-207.52K | CA$646.43K | ▲ +79.1% |
| 2010 | -1.54x | CA$-801.99K | CA$521.51K | ▼ -226.2% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | CA$-229.13K | CA$486.08K | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2008 | -1.78x | CA$-479.02K | CA$269.65K | ▼ -753.3% |
| 2007 | -0.21x | CA$-178.72K | CA$858.43K | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2006 | -1.03x | CA$-508.95K | CA$494.29K | ▼ -399.4% |
| 2005 | -0.21x | CA$-264.12K | CA$1.28 Million | ▲ +24.9% |
| 2004 | -0.27x | CA$-329.06K | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2003 | -1.58x | CA$-118.51K | CA$75.12K | — |