Opawica Explorations Inc (OPW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Opawica Explorations Inc (OPW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-93.81K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$870.04K) in one year. See Opawica Explorations Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Opawica Explorations Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Opawica Explorations Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Opawica Explorations Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Opawica Explorations Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Opawica Explorations Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OPW stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.67x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$816.76K | ▼ -1058.6% |
| 2024 | -0.23x | CA$-227.81K | CA$989.20K | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2023 | -0.73x | CA$-832.57K | CA$1.14 Million | ▲ +81.6% |
| 2022 | -3.96x | CA$-2.64 Million | CA$666.96K | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2021 | -2.80x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$528.65K | ▼ -41.7% |
| 2020 | -1.97x | CA$-352.31K | CA$178.47K | ▼ -147.2% |
| 2019 | -0.80x | CA$-132.43K | CA$165.80K | ▲ +93.6% |
| 2018 | -12.56x | CA$-456.94K | CA$36.38K | ▼ -228.6% |
| 2017 | -3.82x | CA$-377.37K | CA$98.73K | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2016 | -4.16x | CA$-209.22K | CA$50.26K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2015 | -3.61x | CA$-98.51K | CA$27.29K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2014 | -17.14x | CA$-496.24K | CA$28.95K | ▼ -477.7% |
| 2013 | -2.97x | CA$-1.94 Million | CA$654.86K | ▼ -260.0% |
| 2012 | -0.82x | CA$-446.57K | CA$541.81K | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2011 | -2.82x | CA$-506.60K | CA$179.86K | ▲ +51.6% |
| 2010 | -5.82x | CA$-841.03K | CA$144.60K | ▼ -337.1% |
| 2009 | -1.33x | CA$-582.91K | CA$438.03K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2008 | -1.52x | CA$-765.42K | CA$502.59K | ▼ -106.8% |
| 2007 | -0.74x | CA$-240.79K | CA$326.90K | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2006 | -6.45x | CA$-1.10 Million | CA$171.38K | ▼ -66.6% |
| 2005 | -3.87x | CA$-481.38K | CA$124.39K | ▼ -286.0% |
| 2004 | -1.00x | CA$-172.95K | CA$172.52K | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2003 | -4.85x | CA$-425.23K | CA$87.74K | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2002 | -11.98x | CA$-539.00K | CA$44.99K | ▼ -613.5% |
| 2001 | -1.68x | CA$-319.17K | CA$190.08K | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2000 | -1.93x | CA$-278.89K | CA$144.13K | ▲ +61.3% |
| 1999 | -5.00x | CA$-500.00K | CA$100.00K | ▲ +28.6% |
| 1998 | -7.00x | CA$-700.00K | CA$100.00K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 1997 | -6.00x | CA$-600.00K | CA$100.00K | ▼ -60.4% |
| 1996 | -3.74x | CA$-681.19K | CA$182.13K | — |