Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd (PEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd (PEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -5.64x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-537.63K could theoretically repay -6% of its total liabilities (CA$95.25K) in one year. See how financially flexible is Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd. Check how high is Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -54.45x | CA$-5.19 Million | CA$95.25K | ▼ -158.2% |
| 2024 | -21.09x | CA$-3.48 Million | CA$165.17K | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2023 | -13.74x | CA$-8.69 Million | CA$632.37K | ▼ -253.3% |
| 2022 | -3.89x | CA$-6.95 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2021 | -11.98x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$252.05K | ▼ -123.5% |
| 2020 | -5.36x | CA$-817.11K | CA$152.45K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2019 | -5.25x | CA$-458.29K | CA$87.31K | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2018 | -2.29x | CA$-535.64K | CA$233.71K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2017 | -19.86x | CA$-728.82K | CA$36.70K | ▼ -829.1% |
| 2016 | -2.14x | CA$-407.89K | CA$190.87K | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2015 | -95.71x | CA$-356.03K | CA$3.72K | ▼ -422.7% |
| 2014 | -18.31x | CA$-317.69K | CA$17.35K | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2013 | -21.97x | CA$-667.57K | CA$30.38K | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2012 | -19.51x | CA$-2.54 Million | CA$129.93K | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2011 | -21.62x | CA$-4.00 Million | CA$185.21K | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2010 | -12.37x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$144.53K | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2009 | -7.69x | CA$-827.84K | CA$107.66K | ▼ -110.2% |
| 2008 | -3.66x | CA$-429.04K | CA$117.28K | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2007 | -2.44x | CA$-475.64K | CA$194.61K | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2006 | -1.42x | CA$-288.12K | CA$202.23K | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2005 | -4.40x | CA$-219.42K | CA$49.86K | ▼ -193.1% |
| 2004 | -1.50x | CA$-193.20K | CA$128.70K | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2003 | -2.45x | CA$-384.32K | CA$156.85K | ▼ -945.8% |
| 2002 | -0.23x | CA$-42.37K | CA$180.83K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2001 | -7.32x | CA$-214.92K | CA$29.36K | ▼ -253.7% |
| 2000 | -2.07x | CA$-57.43K | CA$27.76K | — |