Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd (PEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -5.64x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-537.63K could theoretically repay -6% of its total liabilities (CA$95.25K) in one year. Check Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd (2000–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd from 2000 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd across 26 annual periods. Check PEX cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2025)
Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Pacific Ridge Exploration Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -54.45x | CA$-5.19 Million | CA$95.25K | ▼ -158.2% |
| 2024 | -21.09x | CA$-3.48 Million | CA$165.17K | ▼ -53.5% |
| 2023 | -13.74x | CA$-8.69 Million | CA$632.37K | ▼ -253.3% |
| 2022 | -3.89x | CA$-6.95 Million | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2021 | -11.98x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$252.05K | ▼ -123.5% |
| 2020 | -5.36x | CA$-817.11K | CA$152.45K | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2019 | -5.25x | CA$-458.29K | CA$87.31K | ▼ -129.0% |
| 2018 | -2.29x | CA$-535.64K | CA$233.71K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2017 | -19.86x | CA$-728.82K | CA$36.70K | ▼ -829.1% |
| 2016 | -2.14x | CA$-407.89K | CA$190.87K | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2015 | -95.71x | CA$-356.03K | CA$3.72K | ▼ -422.7% |
| 2014 | -18.31x | CA$-317.69K | CA$17.35K | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2013 | -21.97x | CA$-667.57K | CA$30.38K | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2012 | -19.51x | CA$-2.54 Million | CA$129.93K | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2011 | -21.62x | CA$-4.00 Million | CA$185.21K | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2010 | -12.37x | CA$-1.79 Million | CA$144.53K | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2009 | -7.69x | CA$-827.84K | CA$107.66K | ▼ -110.2% |
| 2008 | -3.66x | CA$-429.04K | CA$117.28K | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2007 | -2.44x | CA$-475.64K | CA$194.61K | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2006 | -1.42x | CA$-288.12K | CA$202.23K | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2005 | -4.40x | CA$-219.42K | CA$49.86K | ▼ -193.1% |
| 2004 | -1.50x | CA$-193.20K | CA$128.70K | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2003 | -2.45x | CA$-384.32K | CA$156.85K | ▼ -945.8% |
| 2002 | -0.23x | CA$-42.37K | CA$180.83K | ▲ +96.8% |
| 2001 | -7.32x | CA$-214.92K | CA$29.36K | ▼ -253.7% |
| 2000 | -2.07x | CA$-57.43K | CA$27.76K | — |