Patagonia Gold Corp (PGDC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Patagonia Gold Corp (PGDC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$74.97 Million) in one year. See Patagonia Gold Corp leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Patagonia Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Patagonia Gold Corp across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Patagonia Gold Corp (PGDC) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Patagonia Gold Corp (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Patagonia Gold Corp. Check PGDC cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.07x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$64.44 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-5.15 Million | CA$55.89 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | CA$-5.74 Million | CA$42.31 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | CA$-5.33 Million | CA$41.49 Million | ▼ -770.2% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | CA$-591.00K | CA$40.04 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | CA$-535.00K | CA$38.66 Million | ▼ -122.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$2.77 Million | CA$45.61 Million | ▲ +126.2% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-7.56 Million | CA$32.53 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2017 | -0.23x | CA$-9.31 Million | CA$39.73 Million | ▼ -678.3% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | CA$1.49 Million | CA$36.66 Million | ▲ +109.5% |
| 2015 | -0.43x | CA$-9.36 Million | CA$22.00 Million | ▼ -199.6% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-2.87 Million | CA$20.21 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$23.73 Million | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2012 | -2.99x | CA$-21.15 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2011 | -2.97x | CA$-25.18 Million | CA$8.47 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2010 | -2.60x | CA$-10.45 Million | CA$4.02 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2009 | -3.75x | CA$-10.26 Million | CA$2.74 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2008 | -3.22x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2007 | -7.22x | CA$-7.66 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2006 | -10.34x | CA$-6.10 Million | CA$589.72K | ▼ -306.9% |
| 2005 | -2.54x | CA$-3.74 Million | CA$1.47 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2004 | -3.06x | CA$-4.97 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2003 | -8.86x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$324.68K | ▲ +87.3% |
| 2002 | -70.00x | CA$-329.52K | CA$4.71K | ▼ -5627.3% |
| 2001 | -1.22x | CA$-16.20K | CA$13.25K | — |