Patagonia Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Patagonia Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Patagonia Gold Corp (PGDC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$74.97 Million) in one year. Check Patagonia Gold Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Patagonia Gold Corp (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Patagonia Gold Corp from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Patagonia Gold Corp across 25 annual periods. Check Patagonia Gold Corp total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Patagonia Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Patagonia Gold Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Patagonia Gold Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Patagonia Gold Corp (PGDC) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.07x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$64.44 Million | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-5.15 Million | CA$55.89 Million | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2023 | -0.14x | CA$-5.74 Million | CA$42.31 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2022 | -0.13x | CA$-5.33 Million | CA$41.49 Million | ▼ -770.2% |
| 2021 | -0.01x | CA$-591.00K | CA$40.04 Million | ▼ -6.7% |
| 2020 | -0.01x | CA$-535.00K | CA$38.66 Million | ▼ -122.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$2.77 Million | CA$45.61 Million | ▲ +126.2% |
| 2018 | -0.23x | CA$-7.56 Million | CA$32.53 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2017 | -0.23x | CA$-9.31 Million | CA$39.73 Million | ▼ -678.3% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | CA$1.49 Million | CA$36.66 Million | ▲ +109.5% |
| 2015 | -0.43x | CA$-9.36 Million | CA$22.00 Million | ▼ -199.6% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CA$-2.87 Million | CA$20.21 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | CA$-2.06 Million | CA$23.73 Million | ▲ +97.1% |
| 2012 | -2.99x | CA$-21.15 Million | CA$7.07 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2011 | -2.97x | CA$-25.18 Million | CA$8.47 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2010 | -2.60x | CA$-10.45 Million | CA$4.02 Million | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2009 | -3.75x | CA$-10.26 Million | CA$2.74 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2008 | -3.22x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$2.45 Million | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2007 | -7.22x | CA$-7.66 Million | CA$1.06 Million | ▲ +30.1% |
| 2006 | -10.34x | CA$-6.10 Million | CA$589.72K | ▼ -306.9% |
| 2005 | -2.54x | CA$-3.74 Million | CA$1.47 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2004 | -3.06x | CA$-4.97 Million | CA$1.63 Million | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2003 | -8.86x | CA$-2.88 Million | CA$324.68K | ▲ +87.3% |
| 2002 | -70.00x | CA$-329.52K | CA$4.71K | ▼ -5627.3% |
| 2001 | -1.22x | CA$-16.20K | CA$13.25K | — |