Playfair Mining Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Playfair Mining Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Playfair Mining Ltd. (PLY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.25x as of May 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-224.69K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$180.13K) in one year. Check PLY cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Playfair Mining Ltd. (2002–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Playfair Mining Ltd. from 2002 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Playfair Mining Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Check PLY cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Playfair Mining Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2026)
Playfair Mining Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Playfair Mining Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Playfair Mining Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.21x | CA$-88.08K | CA$410.20K | ▼ -2692.4% |
| 2025 | -0.01x | CA$-2.41K | CA$313.01K | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2024 | -0.18x | CA$-55.51K | CA$301.02K | ▲ +59.5% |
| 2023 | -0.46x | CA$-113.91K | CA$249.99K | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2022 | -0.70x | CA$-126.59K | CA$181.69K | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2021 | -0.76x | CA$-264.86K | CA$348.99K | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2020 | -0.74x | CA$-178.76K | CA$239.98K | ▼ -115.7% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | CA$-67.59K | CA$195.72K | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2018 | -0.39x | CA$-79.20K | CA$204.26K | ▲ +83.0% |
| 2017 | -2.28x | CA$-479.37K | CA$210.70K | ▼ -421.3% |
| 2016 | -0.44x | CA$-73.69K | CA$168.82K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2015 | -1.17x | CA$-282.93K | CA$241.88K | ▼ -288.7% |
| 2014 | -0.30x | CA$-83.80K | CA$278.45K | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2013 | -0.70x | CA$-338.04K | CA$484.92K | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2012 | -0.36x | CA$-343.53K | CA$953.14K | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2011 | -1.09x | CA$-649.43K | CA$596.45K | ▼ -110.7% |
| 2010 | -0.52x | CA$-246.68K | CA$477.41K | ▼ -500.8% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | CA$120.77K | CA$936.74K | ▲ +105.2% |
| 2008 | -2.47x | CA$-934.45K | CA$377.88K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2007 | -9.75x | CA$-977.60K | CA$100.26K | ▼ -65.4% |
| 2006 | -5.90x | CA$-312.09K | CA$52.94K | ▼ -111.4% |
| 2005 | -2.79x | CA$-137.86K | CA$49.44K | ▼ -411.4% |
| 2004 | -0.55x | CA$-52.60K | CA$96.48K | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2003 | -2.25x | CA$-93.14K | CA$41.45K | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2002 | -15.50x | CA$-560.74K | CA$36.17K | — |