Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd (QZM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd (QZM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -9.18x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-723.21K could theoretically repay -9% of its total liabilities (CA$78.81K) in one year. See Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd (QZM) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. Also explore QZM shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quartz Mountain Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see QZM market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -11.18x | CA$-3.15 Million | CA$281.44K | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2024 | -7.02x | CA$-2.34 Million | CA$333.04K | ▲ +2.4% |
| 2023 | -7.18x | CA$-523.78K | CA$72.90K | ▼ -435.7% |
| 2022 | -1.34x | CA$-445.68K | CA$332.29K | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2021 | -2.05x | CA$-277.11K | CA$135.04K | ▲ +32.4% |
| 2020 | -3.04x | CA$-242.88K | CA$80.01K | ▼ -10089.0% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | CA$-91.65K | CA$3.08 Million | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2018 | -0.21x | CA$-619.91K | CA$2.92 Million | ▼ -748.6% |
| 2017 | -0.03x | CA$-82.60K | CA$3.30 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | CA$-109.86K | CA$3.18 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2015 | -0.12x | CA$-429.57K | CA$3.48 Million | ▼ -716.2% |
| 2014 | -0.02x | CA$-53.94K | CA$3.56 Million | ▲ +98.9% |
| 2013 | -1.33x | CA$-4.24 Million | CA$3.19 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2012 | -0.91x | CA$-1.67 Million | CA$1.83 Million | ▲ +76.2% |
| 2011 | -3.83x | CA$-161.15K | CA$42.10K | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2010 | -4.68x | CA$-143.73K | CA$30.70K | ▼ -30.5% |
| 2009 | -3.59x | CA$-215.63K | CA$60.11K | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2008 | -3.54x | CA$-74.35K | CA$21.03K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 2007 | -28.29x | CA$-434.00K | CA$15.34K | ▼ -438.5% |
| 2006 | -5.25x | CA$-99.01K | CA$18.85K | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2005 | -8.28x | CA$-128.20K | CA$15.48K | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2004 | -5.13x | CA$-155.96K | CA$30.40K | ▼ -274.9% |
| 2003 | -1.37x | CA$-54.85K | CA$40.08K | ▼ -224.8% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | CA$-55.52K | CA$131.77K | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2001 | -0.32x | CA$-39.55K | CA$122.71K | — |