Rock Tech Lithium Inc (RCK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rock Tech Lithium Inc (RCK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.24 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Rock Tech Lithium Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rock Tech Lithium Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rock Tech Lithium Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore RCK net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rock Tech Lithium Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rock Tech Lithium Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RCK company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.47x | CA$-9.77 Million | CA$2.19 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | -4.01x | CA$-12.40 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2023 | -4.78x | CA$-25.91 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2022 | -6.67x | CA$-57.72 Million | CA$8.65 Million | ▼ -348.8% |
| 2021 | -1.49x | CA$-14.57 Million | CA$9.80 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | -1.69x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$781.10K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | -4.27x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$242.67K | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2018 | -5.82x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$292.49K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2017 | -3.54x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$343.65K | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2016 | -2.24x | CA$-687.43K | CA$306.24K | ▼ -134.7% |
| 2015 | -0.96x | CA$-438.99K | CA$458.92K | ▼ -241.6% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-303.52K | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | CA$-483.37K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2012 | -0.86x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2011 | -1.51x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2010 | -1.20x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -101.0% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | CA$-524.06K | CA$880.69K | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2008 | -13.35x | CA$-543.87K | CA$40.73K | ▼ -1194.5% |
| 2007 | -1.03x | CA$-720.31K | CA$698.28K | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2006 | -3.17x | CA$-278.00K | CA$87.67K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.59x | CA$-297.60K | CA$82.95K | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2004 | -3.13x | CA$-232.37K | CA$74.16K | ▼ -177.2% |
| 2003 | -1.13x | CA$-131.34K | CA$116.19K | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | -1.32x | CA$-140.08K | CA$105.73K | ▼ -147.1% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | CA$-65.56K | CA$122.29K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2000 | -1.14x | CA$-155.26K | CA$136.56K | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1999 | -1.40x | CA$-31.05K | CA$22.16K | — |