Rock Tech Lithium Inc (RCK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of December 2025:
-1.48x
Rock Tech Lithium Inc (RCK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.24 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Million) in one year. See Rock Tech Lithium Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
-1.48x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
CA$-3.24 Million
CAD
Total Liabilities
CA$2.19 Million
CAD
Data as of
Dec 2025
Most recent filing
Rock Tech Lithium Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rock Tech Lithium Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Rock Tech Lithium Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rock Tech Lithium Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rock Tech Lithium Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.47x | CA$-9.77 Million | CA$2.19 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | -4.01x | CA$-12.40 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2023 | -4.78x | CA$-25.91 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2022 | -6.67x | CA$-57.72 Million | CA$8.65 Million | ▼ -348.8% |
| 2021 | -1.49x | CA$-14.57 Million | CA$9.80 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | -1.69x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$781.10K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | -4.27x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$242.67K | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2018 | -5.82x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$292.49K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2017 | -3.54x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$343.65K | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2016 | -2.24x | CA$-687.43K | CA$306.24K | ▼ -134.7% |
| 2015 | -0.96x | CA$-438.99K | CA$458.92K | ▼ -241.6% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-303.52K | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | CA$-483.37K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2012 | -0.86x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2011 | -1.51x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2010 | -1.20x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -101.0% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | CA$-524.06K | CA$880.69K | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2008 | -13.35x | CA$-543.87K | CA$40.73K | ▼ -1194.5% |
| 2007 | -1.03x | CA$-720.31K | CA$698.28K | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2006 | -3.17x | CA$-278.00K | CA$87.67K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.59x | CA$-297.60K | CA$82.95K | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2004 | -3.13x | CA$-232.37K | CA$74.16K | ▼ -177.2% |
| 2003 | -1.13x | CA$-131.34K | CA$116.19K | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | -1.32x | CA$-140.08K | CA$105.73K | ▼ -147.1% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | CA$-65.56K | CA$122.29K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2000 | -1.14x | CA$-155.26K | CA$136.56K | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1999 | -1.40x | CA$-31.05K | CA$22.16K | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.