Rock Tech Lithium Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rock Tech Lithium Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Rock Tech Lithium Inc (RCK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-3.24 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$2.19 Million) in one year. See RCK financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Rock Tech Lithium Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Rock Tech Lithium Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Rock Tech Lithium Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Rock Tech Lithium Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Rock Tech Lithium Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Rock Tech Lithium Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rock Tech Lithium Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Rock Tech Lithium Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -4.47x | CA$-9.77 Million | CA$2.19 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2024 | -4.01x | CA$-12.40 Million | CA$3.09 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2023 | -4.78x | CA$-25.91 Million | CA$5.42 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2022 | -6.67x | CA$-57.72 Million | CA$8.65 Million | ▼ -348.8% |
| 2021 | -1.49x | CA$-14.57 Million | CA$9.80 Million | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2020 | -1.69x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$781.10K | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | -4.27x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$242.67K | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2018 | -5.82x | CA$-1.70 Million | CA$292.49K | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2017 | -3.54x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$343.65K | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2016 | -2.24x | CA$-687.43K | CA$306.24K | ▼ -134.7% |
| 2015 | -0.96x | CA$-438.99K | CA$458.92K | ▼ -241.6% |
| 2014 | -0.28x | CA$-303.52K | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | CA$-483.37K | CA$1.89 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 2012 | -0.86x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2011 | -1.51x | CA$-2.10 Million | CA$1.40 Million | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2010 | -1.20x | CA$-1.51 Million | CA$1.26 Million | ▼ -101.0% |
| 2009 | -0.60x | CA$-524.06K | CA$880.69K | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2008 | -13.35x | CA$-543.87K | CA$40.73K | ▼ -1194.5% |
| 2007 | -1.03x | CA$-720.31K | CA$698.28K | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2006 | -3.17x | CA$-278.00K | CA$87.67K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2005 | -3.59x | CA$-297.60K | CA$82.95K | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2004 | -3.13x | CA$-232.37K | CA$74.16K | ▼ -177.2% |
| 2003 | -1.13x | CA$-131.34K | CA$116.19K | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2002 | -1.32x | CA$-140.08K | CA$105.73K | ▼ -147.1% |
| 2001 | -0.54x | CA$-65.56K | CA$122.29K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2000 | -1.14x | CA$-155.26K | CA$136.56K | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1999 | -1.40x | CA$-31.05K | CA$22.16K | — |