Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc (RDS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc (RDS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$407.99K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$10.61 Million) in one year. See Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc. Check Ressources Minieres Radisson Inc (RDS) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.18x | CA$-1.77 Million | CA$9.82 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 2024 | -0.15x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$8.40 Million | ▼ -728.6% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | CA$-120.87K | CA$6.90 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2022 | -0.23x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$5.73 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 2021 | -0.14x | CA$-1.19 Million | CA$8.42 Million | ▼ -25.2% |
| 2020 | -0.11x | CA$-831.40K | CA$7.37 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2019 | -0.23x | CA$-843.50K | CA$3.70 Million | ▲ +9.9% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | CA$-455.73K | CA$1.80 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2017 | -0.32x | CA$-480.77K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -127.8% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | CA$-520.40K | CA$3.69 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2015 | -0.13x | CA$-402.97K | CA$3.03 Million | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2014 | -0.16x | CA$-463.84K | CA$2.93 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | CA$-581.23K | CA$2.87 Million | ▼ -178.5% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | CA$-193.16K | CA$2.66 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | CA$-253.58K | CA$2.33 Million | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2010 | -0.17x | CA$-270.21K | CA$1.54 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | CA$-365.70K | CA$1.37 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2008 | -0.30x | CA$-475.89K | CA$1.59 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2007 | -0.44x | CA$-512.62K | CA$1.17 Million | ▲ +26.8% |
| 2006 | -0.60x | CA$-591.48K | CA$988.73K | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2005 | -0.41x | CA$-444.15K | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2004 | -0.29x | CA$-257.63K | CA$874.79K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2003 | -0.23x | CA$-215.60K | CA$928.53K | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2002 | -0.18x | CA$-355.34K | CA$1.94 Million | ▼ -15654.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | CA$2.58K | CA$2.20 Million | ▲ +102.4% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | CA$-133.14K | CA$2.67 Million | ▲ +85.2% |
| 1999 | -0.34x | CA$-201.58K | CA$596.98K | — |