Canstar Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canstar Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canstar Resources Inc (ROX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.53x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.07 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$2.01 Million) in one year. Check ROX operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canstar Resources Inc (2000–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canstar Resources Inc from 2000 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canstar Resources Inc across 25 annual periods. Check Canstar Resources Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Canstar Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2024)
Canstar Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canstar Resources Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Canstar Resources Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -10.25x | CA$-1.21 Million | CA$117.61K | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2023 | -14.53x | CA$-4.09 Million | CA$281.44K | ▼ -93.4% |
| 2022 | -7.51x | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$205.03K | ▼ -630.4% |
| 2021 | -1.03x | CA$-302.01K | CA$293.68K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2020 | -3.03x | CA$-330.49K | CA$109.09K | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2019 | -1.88x | CA$-419.64K | CA$223.33K | ▼ -5275.3% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | CA$-62.51K | CA$1.79 Million | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2017 | -1.58x | CA$-243.28K | CA$153.58K | ▲ +34.3% |
| 2016 | -2.41x | CA$-229.73K | CA$95.31K | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2015 | -2.64x | CA$-221.43K | CA$84.01K | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2014 | -2.92x | CA$-320.43K | CA$109.89K | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2013 | -1.29x | CA$-201.41K | CA$155.79K | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2012 | -1.95x | CA$-137.32K | CA$70.28K | ▼ -490.3% |
| 2011 | -0.33x | CA$-121.74K | CA$367.81K | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2010 | -0.36x | CA$-124.45K | CA$349.04K | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2009 | -0.50x | CA$-165.27K | CA$330.87K | ▲ +87.4% |
| 2008 | -3.97x | CA$-215.31K | CA$54.28K | ▼ -94.1% |
| 2007 | -2.04x | CA$-188.85K | CA$92.39K | ▲ +51.9% |
| 2006 | -4.25x | CA$-412.87K | CA$97.16K | ▼ -247.4% |
| 2005 | -1.22x | CA$-428.84K | CA$350.55K | ▲ +15.1% |
| 2004 | -1.44x | CA$-227.34K | CA$157.77K | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2003 | -5.54x | CA$-221.67K | CA$39.98K | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2002 | -4.36x | CA$-255.25K | CA$58.52K | ▼ -138.4% |
| 2001 | -1.83x | CA$-759.29K | CA$415.03K | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2000 | -2.74x | CA$-950.02K | CA$346.98K | — |