Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.58x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.44 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Red Pine Exploration Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Red Pine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Pine Exploration Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Red Pine Exploration Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Red Pine Exploration Inc (1997–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Pine Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RPX market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -10.27x | CA$-10.99 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | -6.50x | CA$-10.87 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2021 | -9.42x | CA$-16.77 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2020 | -4.51x | CA$-3.40 Million | CA$753.91K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -10.14x | CA$-4.89 Million | CA$482.66K | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2018 | -6.45x | CA$-4.19 Million | CA$649.31K | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2017 | -3.95x | CA$-4.63 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2016 | -1.29x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -2.94x | CA$-2.14 Million | CA$730.35K | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2014 | -5.24x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$440.50K | ▼ -6817.2% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-75.66K | CA$998.34K | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-330.20K | CA$879.20K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2011 | -1.65x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$677.50K | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2010 | -0.73x | CA$-598.24K | CA$815.32K | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-119.62K | CA$418.93K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2008 | -2.10x | CA$-336.60K | CA$159.96K | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2007 | -1.31x | CA$-443.05K | CA$337.49K | ▼ -1247.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$45.63K | CA$398.88K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-339.78K | CA$90.19K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2004 | -2.54x | CA$-191.61K | CA$75.54K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -16.67x | CA$-199.19K | CA$11.95K | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2002 | -10.10x | CA$-157.59K | CA$15.60K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2001 | -8.66x | CA$-291.24K | CA$33.64K | ▼ -770.1% |
| 2000 | -0.99x | CA$-287.68K | CA$289.14K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | CA$-620.43K | CA$392.70K | ▼ -201.7% |
| 1998 | -0.52x | CA$-432.49K | CA$825.99K | ▲ +65.6% |
| 1997 | -1.52x | CA$-875.25K | CA$574.81K | — |