Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.58x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.44 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. See Red Pine Exploration Inc free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Red Pine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Pine Exploration Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Red Pine Exploration Inc cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Red Pine Exploration Inc (1997–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Pine Exploration Inc. Check Red Pine Exploration Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -10.27x | CA$-10.99 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | -6.50x | CA$-10.87 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2021 | -9.42x | CA$-16.77 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2020 | -4.51x | CA$-3.40 Million | CA$753.91K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -10.14x | CA$-4.89 Million | CA$482.66K | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2018 | -6.45x | CA$-4.19 Million | CA$649.31K | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2017 | -3.95x | CA$-4.63 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2016 | -1.29x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -2.94x | CA$-2.14 Million | CA$730.35K | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2014 | -5.24x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$440.50K | ▼ -6817.2% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-75.66K | CA$998.34K | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-330.20K | CA$879.20K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2011 | -1.65x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$677.50K | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2010 | -0.73x | CA$-598.24K | CA$815.32K | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-119.62K | CA$418.93K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2008 | -2.10x | CA$-336.60K | CA$159.96K | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2007 | -1.31x | CA$-443.05K | CA$337.49K | ▼ -1247.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$45.63K | CA$398.88K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-339.78K | CA$90.19K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2004 | -2.54x | CA$-191.61K | CA$75.54K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -16.67x | CA$-199.19K | CA$11.95K | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2002 | -10.10x | CA$-157.59K | CA$15.60K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2001 | -8.66x | CA$-291.24K | CA$33.64K | ▼ -770.1% |
| 2000 | -0.99x | CA$-287.68K | CA$289.14K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | CA$-620.43K | CA$392.70K | ▼ -201.7% |
| 1998 | -0.52x | CA$-432.49K | CA$825.99K | ▲ +65.6% |
| 1997 | -1.52x | CA$-875.25K | CA$574.81K | — |