Red Pine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Pine Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.58x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.44 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. Check Red Pine Exploration Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Red Pine Exploration Inc (1997–2023)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Red Pine Exploration Inc from 1997 to 2023. Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Pine Exploration Inc across 27 annual periods. Check RPX total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Red Pine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2023)
Red Pine Exploration Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2023. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Pine Exploration Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -10.27x | CA$-10.99 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | -6.50x | CA$-10.87 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2021 | -9.42x | CA$-16.77 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2020 | -4.51x | CA$-3.40 Million | CA$753.91K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -10.14x | CA$-4.89 Million | CA$482.66K | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2018 | -6.45x | CA$-4.19 Million | CA$649.31K | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2017 | -3.95x | CA$-4.63 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2016 | -1.29x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -2.94x | CA$-2.14 Million | CA$730.35K | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2014 | -5.24x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$440.50K | ▼ -6817.2% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-75.66K | CA$998.34K | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-330.20K | CA$879.20K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2011 | -1.65x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$677.50K | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2010 | -0.73x | CA$-598.24K | CA$815.32K | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-119.62K | CA$418.93K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2008 | -2.10x | CA$-336.60K | CA$159.96K | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2007 | -1.31x | CA$-443.05K | CA$337.49K | ▼ -1247.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$45.63K | CA$398.88K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-339.78K | CA$90.19K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2004 | -2.54x | CA$-191.61K | CA$75.54K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -16.67x | CA$-199.19K | CA$11.95K | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2002 | -10.10x | CA$-157.59K | CA$15.60K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2001 | -8.66x | CA$-291.24K | CA$33.64K | ▼ -770.1% |
| 2000 | -0.99x | CA$-287.68K | CA$289.14K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | CA$-620.43K | CA$392.70K | ▼ -201.7% |
| 1998 | -0.52x | CA$-432.49K | CA$825.99K | ▲ +65.6% |
| 1997 | -1.52x | CA$-875.25K | CA$574.81K | — |