Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.58x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-2.44 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Red Pine Exploration Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Red Pine Exploration Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2023)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Red Pine Exploration Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore RPX net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Red Pine Exploration Inc (1997–2023)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Red Pine Exploration Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Red Pine Exploration Inc (RPX) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | -10.27x | CA$-10.99 Million | CA$1.07 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2022 | -6.50x | CA$-10.87 Million | CA$1.67 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2021 | -9.42x | CA$-16.77 Million | CA$1.78 Million | ▼ -109.0% |
| 2020 | -4.51x | CA$-3.40 Million | CA$753.91K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -10.14x | CA$-4.89 Million | CA$482.66K | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2018 | -6.45x | CA$-4.19 Million | CA$649.31K | ▼ -63.3% |
| 2017 | -3.95x | CA$-4.63 Million | CA$1.17 Million | ▼ -206.2% |
| 2016 | -1.29x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2015 | -2.94x | CA$-2.14 Million | CA$730.35K | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2014 | -5.24x | CA$-2.31 Million | CA$440.50K | ▼ -6817.2% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-75.66K | CA$998.34K | ▲ +79.8% |
| 2012 | -0.38x | CA$-330.20K | CA$879.20K | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2011 | -1.65x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$677.50K | ▼ -124.9% |
| 2010 | -0.73x | CA$-598.24K | CA$815.32K | ▼ -157.0% |
| 2009 | -0.29x | CA$-119.62K | CA$418.93K | ▲ +86.4% |
| 2008 | -2.10x | CA$-336.60K | CA$159.96K | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2007 | -1.31x | CA$-443.05K | CA$337.49K | ▼ -1247.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$45.63K | CA$398.88K | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2005 | -3.77x | CA$-339.78K | CA$90.19K | ▼ -48.5% |
| 2004 | -2.54x | CA$-191.61K | CA$75.54K | ▲ +84.8% |
| 2003 | -16.67x | CA$-199.19K | CA$11.95K | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2002 | -10.10x | CA$-157.59K | CA$15.60K | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2001 | -8.66x | CA$-291.24K | CA$33.64K | ▼ -770.1% |
| 2000 | -0.99x | CA$-287.68K | CA$289.14K | ▲ +37.0% |
| 1999 | -1.58x | CA$-620.43K | CA$392.70K | ▼ -201.7% |
| 1998 | -0.52x | CA$-432.49K | CA$825.99K | ▲ +65.6% |
| 1997 | -1.52x | CA$-875.25K | CA$574.81K | — |