Biosyent Inc. (RX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Biosyent Inc. (RX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.88 Million) in one year. Explore Biosyent Inc. (RX) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Biosyent Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Biosyent Inc. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Biosyent Inc. total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Biosyent Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Biosyent Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Biosyent Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.36x | CA$8.66 Million | CA$6.36 Million | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | CA$5.83 Million | CA$6.77 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$7.12 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2021 | 0.83x | CA$4.67 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2020 | 1.02x | CA$6.89 Million | CA$6.78 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$4.77 Million | CA$5.17 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2018 | 1.75x | CA$6.29 Million | CA$3.58 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2017 | 2.26x | CA$6.55 Million | CA$2.89 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2016 | 1.74x | CA$4.40 Million | CA$2.52 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2015 | 1.14x | CA$2.81 Million | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2014 | 1.46x | CA$3.64 Million | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2013 | 1.71x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2012 | 1.54x | CA$1.25 Million | CA$813.36K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | CA$596.08K | CA$422.37K | ▲ +854.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$37.89K | CA$256.17K | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2009 | -2.44x | CA$-342.79K | CA$140.70K | ▼ -164.5% |
| 2008 | -0.92x | CA$-260.09K | CA$282.37K | ▼ -1312.3% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$14.25K | CA$187.53K | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2006 | 0.97x | CA$222.26K | CA$229.20K | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2005 | 3.51x | CA$747.81K | CA$213.28K | ▲ +1150.3% |
| 2004 | -0.33x | CA$-104.39K | CA$312.72K | ▲ +91.1% |
| 2003 | -3.76x | CA$-626.35K | CA$166.53K | ▼ -143.3% |
| 2002 | 8.68x | CA$905.12K | CA$104.22K | ▲ +3363.4% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-337.40K | CA$1.27 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | CA$-126.07K | CA$964.15K | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CA$-200.00K | CA$800.00K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1998 | -2.00x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$500.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1997 | -0.67x | CA$-400.00K | CA$600.00K | — |