Biosyent Inc. (RX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Biosyent Inc. (RX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.35x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$2.77 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$7.88 Million) in one year. See RX free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Biosyent Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Biosyent Inc. across 28 annual periods. Also explore Biosyent Inc. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Biosyent Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Biosyent Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Biosyent Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.36x | CA$8.66 Million | CA$6.36 Million | ▲ +58.4% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | CA$5.83 Million | CA$6.77 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2022 | 0.69x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$7.12 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2021 | 0.83x | CA$4.67 Million | CA$5.61 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2020 | 1.02x | CA$6.89 Million | CA$6.78 Million | ▲ +10.3% |
| 2019 | 0.92x | CA$4.77 Million | CA$5.17 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2018 | 1.75x | CA$6.29 Million | CA$3.58 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2017 | 2.26x | CA$6.55 Million | CA$2.89 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2016 | 1.74x | CA$4.40 Million | CA$2.52 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2015 | 1.14x | CA$2.81 Million | CA$2.46 Million | ▼ -21.9% |
| 2014 | 1.46x | CA$3.64 Million | CA$2.48 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2013 | 1.71x | CA$2.12 Million | CA$1.24 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2012 | 1.54x | CA$1.25 Million | CA$813.36K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | CA$596.08K | CA$422.37K | ▲ +854.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$37.89K | CA$256.17K | ▲ +106.1% |
| 2009 | -2.44x | CA$-342.79K | CA$140.70K | ▼ -164.5% |
| 2008 | -0.92x | CA$-260.09K | CA$282.37K | ▼ -1312.3% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$14.25K | CA$187.53K | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2006 | 0.97x | CA$222.26K | CA$229.20K | ▼ -72.3% |
| 2005 | 3.51x | CA$747.81K | CA$213.28K | ▲ +1150.3% |
| 2004 | -0.33x | CA$-104.39K | CA$312.72K | ▲ +91.1% |
| 2003 | -3.76x | CA$-626.35K | CA$166.53K | ▼ -143.3% |
| 2002 | 8.68x | CA$905.12K | CA$104.22K | ▲ +3363.4% |
| 2001 | -0.27x | CA$-337.40K | CA$1.27 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2000 | -0.13x | CA$-126.07K | CA$964.15K | ▲ +47.7% |
| 1999 | -0.25x | CA$-200.00K | CA$800.00K | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1998 | -2.00x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$500.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1997 | -0.67x | CA$-400.00K | CA$600.00K | — |