Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-454.59K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$449.73K) in one year. Check SHL cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Check Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.09x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$521.68K | ▼ -190.6% |
| 2024 | -1.06x | CA$-257.34K | CA$241.90K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | -2.50x | CA$-397.27K | CA$159.16K | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2022 | -4.94x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$612.23K | ▼ -603.1% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.54x | CA$-981.41K | CA$386.60K | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2019 | -0.95x | CA$-514.84K | CA$541.13K | ▼ -1003.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-55.12K | CA$639.16K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-292.77K | CA$416.68K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | CA$-251.05K | CA$694.07K | ▼ -1025.6% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | CA$21.35K | CA$546.28K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2014 | -0.74x | CA$-353.57K | CA$480.10K | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2013 | -3.26x | CA$-917.50K | CA$281.33K | ▼ -381.0% |
| 2012 | -0.68x | CA$-111.86K | CA$164.97K | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2011 | -3.16x | CA$-422.95K | CA$134.00K | ▼ -215.5% |
| 2010 | -1.00x | CA$-362.92K | CA$362.76K | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2009 | -0.51x | CA$-89.84K | CA$175.37K | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2008 | -49.93x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$21.40K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | -39.67x | CA$-550.72K | CA$13.88K | ▼ -527.4% |
| 2006 | -6.32x | CA$-245.31K | CA$38.79K | ▼ -424.1% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | CA$-288.50K | CA$239.08K | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2004 | -1.35x | CA$-196.04K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -1029.1% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-15.03K | CA$125.56K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | CA$-18.24K | CA$53.09K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2001 | -1.97x | CA$-88.27K | CA$44.82K | — |