Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-454.59K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$449.73K) in one year. See SHL FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd.. Check SHL operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.09x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$521.68K | ▼ -190.6% |
| 2024 | -1.06x | CA$-257.34K | CA$241.90K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | -2.50x | CA$-397.27K | CA$159.16K | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2022 | -4.94x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$612.23K | ▼ -603.1% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.54x | CA$-981.41K | CA$386.60K | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2019 | -0.95x | CA$-514.84K | CA$541.13K | ▼ -1003.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-55.12K | CA$639.16K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-292.77K | CA$416.68K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | CA$-251.05K | CA$694.07K | ▼ -1025.6% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | CA$21.35K | CA$546.28K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2014 | -0.74x | CA$-353.57K | CA$480.10K | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2013 | -3.26x | CA$-917.50K | CA$281.33K | ▼ -381.0% |
| 2012 | -0.68x | CA$-111.86K | CA$164.97K | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2011 | -3.16x | CA$-422.95K | CA$134.00K | ▼ -215.5% |
| 2010 | -1.00x | CA$-362.92K | CA$362.76K | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2009 | -0.51x | CA$-89.84K | CA$175.37K | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2008 | -49.93x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$21.40K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | -39.67x | CA$-550.72K | CA$13.88K | ▼ -527.4% |
| 2006 | -6.32x | CA$-245.31K | CA$38.79K | ▼ -424.1% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | CA$-288.50K | CA$239.08K | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2004 | -1.35x | CA$-196.04K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -1029.1% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-15.03K | CA$125.56K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | CA$-18.24K | CA$53.09K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2001 | -1.97x | CA$-88.27K | CA$44.82K | — |