Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.01x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-454.59K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$449.73K) in one year. See Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. across 25 annual periods. Also explore Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (SHL) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Spruce Ridge Resources Ltd. worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -3.09x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$521.68K | ▼ -190.6% |
| 2024 | -1.06x | CA$-257.34K | CA$241.90K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2023 | -2.50x | CA$-397.27K | CA$159.16K | ▲ +49.5% |
| 2022 | -4.94x | CA$-3.02 Million | CA$612.23K | ▼ -603.1% |
| 2021 | -0.70x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2020 | -2.54x | CA$-981.41K | CA$386.60K | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2019 | -0.95x | CA$-514.84K | CA$541.13K | ▼ -1003.3% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | CA$-55.12K | CA$639.16K | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2017 | -0.70x | CA$-292.77K | CA$416.68K | ▼ -94.3% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | CA$-251.05K | CA$694.07K | ▼ -1025.6% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | CA$21.35K | CA$546.28K | ▲ +105.3% |
| 2014 | -0.74x | CA$-353.57K | CA$480.10K | ▲ +77.4% |
| 2013 | -3.26x | CA$-917.50K | CA$281.33K | ▼ -381.0% |
| 2012 | -0.68x | CA$-111.86K | CA$164.97K | ▲ +78.5% |
| 2011 | -3.16x | CA$-422.95K | CA$134.00K | ▼ -215.5% |
| 2010 | -1.00x | CA$-362.92K | CA$362.76K | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2009 | -0.51x | CA$-89.84K | CA$175.37K | ▲ +99.0% |
| 2008 | -49.93x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$21.40K | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2007 | -39.67x | CA$-550.72K | CA$13.88K | ▼ -527.4% |
| 2006 | -6.32x | CA$-245.31K | CA$38.79K | ▼ -424.1% |
| 2005 | -1.21x | CA$-288.50K | CA$239.08K | ▲ +10.7% |
| 2004 | -1.35x | CA$-196.04K | CA$145.09K | ▼ -1029.1% |
| 2003 | -0.12x | CA$-15.03K | CA$125.56K | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | CA$-18.24K | CA$53.09K | ▲ +82.6% |
| 2001 | -1.97x | CA$-88.27K | CA$44.82K | — |