Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-144.87K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$137.82K) in one year. See Sienna Resources Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sienna Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sienna Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Sienna Resources Inc cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sienna Resources Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sienna Resources Inc. Check Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -3.41x | CA$-546.75K | CA$160.30K | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2023 | -4.93x | CA$-701.86K | CA$142.38K | ▼ -272.5% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | CA$-324.29K | CA$245.09K | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2021 | -6.58x | CA$-708.84K | CA$107.76K | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2020 | -2.71x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$410.28K | ▼ -492.5% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | CA$-419.78K | CA$916.37K | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2018 | -1.51x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$965.70K | ▼ -4139.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-69.45K | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2016 | -0.29x | CA$-463.60K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -215.3% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | CA$-140.56K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | CA$-194.21K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-116.42K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -2081.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$4.84K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-548.29K | CA$810.61K | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2010 | -2.64x | CA$-562.79K | CA$213.43K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2009 | -4.04x | CA$-645.43K | CA$159.93K | ▼ -124.4% |
| 2008 | -1.80x | CA$-439.37K | CA$244.28K | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2007 | -2.38x | CA$-568.56K | CA$238.73K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | CA$-450.53K | CA$241.34K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2005 | -7.34x | CA$-560.13K | CA$76.28K | ▼ -277.6% |
| 2004 | -1.94x | CA$-273.31K | CA$140.54K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-108.54K | CA$121.68K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2002 | -2.61x | CA$-138.41K | CA$53.02K | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2001 | -7.08x | CA$-200.21K | CA$28.29K | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2000 | -5.56x | CA$-241.08K | CA$43.35K | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1999 | -5.70x | CA$-217.22K | CA$38.12K | ▼ -1242.9% |
| 1998 | -0.42x | CA$-21.22K | CA$50.01K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | CA$-57.28K | CA$142.74K | — |