Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-144.87K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$137.82K) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Sienna Resources Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sienna Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sienna Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore SIE net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sienna Resources Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sienna Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SIE stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -3.41x | CA$-546.75K | CA$160.30K | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2023 | -4.93x | CA$-701.86K | CA$142.38K | ▼ -272.5% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | CA$-324.29K | CA$245.09K | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2021 | -6.58x | CA$-708.84K | CA$107.76K | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2020 | -2.71x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$410.28K | ▼ -492.5% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | CA$-419.78K | CA$916.37K | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2018 | -1.51x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$965.70K | ▼ -4139.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-69.45K | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2016 | -0.29x | CA$-463.60K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -215.3% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | CA$-140.56K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | CA$-194.21K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-116.42K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -2081.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$4.84K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-548.29K | CA$810.61K | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2010 | -2.64x | CA$-562.79K | CA$213.43K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2009 | -4.04x | CA$-645.43K | CA$159.93K | ▼ -124.4% |
| 2008 | -1.80x | CA$-439.37K | CA$244.28K | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2007 | -2.38x | CA$-568.56K | CA$238.73K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | CA$-450.53K | CA$241.34K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2005 | -7.34x | CA$-560.13K | CA$76.28K | ▼ -277.6% |
| 2004 | -1.94x | CA$-273.31K | CA$140.54K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-108.54K | CA$121.68K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2002 | -2.61x | CA$-138.41K | CA$53.02K | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2001 | -7.08x | CA$-200.21K | CA$28.29K | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2000 | -5.56x | CA$-241.08K | CA$43.35K | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1999 | -5.70x | CA$-217.22K | CA$38.12K | ▼ -1242.9% |
| 1998 | -0.42x | CA$-21.22K | CA$50.01K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | CA$-57.28K | CA$142.74K | — |