Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-144.87K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$137.82K) in one year. Explore SIE long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Sienna Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Sienna Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Sienna Resources Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Sienna Resources Inc (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sienna Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -3.41x | CA$-546.75K | CA$160.30K | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2023 | -4.93x | CA$-701.86K | CA$142.38K | ▼ -272.5% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | CA$-324.29K | CA$245.09K | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2021 | -6.58x | CA$-708.84K | CA$107.76K | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2020 | -2.71x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$410.28K | ▼ -492.5% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | CA$-419.78K | CA$916.37K | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2018 | -1.51x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$965.70K | ▼ -4139.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-69.45K | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2016 | -0.29x | CA$-463.60K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -215.3% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | CA$-140.56K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | CA$-194.21K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-116.42K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -2081.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$4.84K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-548.29K | CA$810.61K | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2010 | -2.64x | CA$-562.79K | CA$213.43K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2009 | -4.04x | CA$-645.43K | CA$159.93K | ▼ -124.4% |
| 2008 | -1.80x | CA$-439.37K | CA$244.28K | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2007 | -2.38x | CA$-568.56K | CA$238.73K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | CA$-450.53K | CA$241.34K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2005 | -7.34x | CA$-560.13K | CA$76.28K | ▼ -277.6% |
| 2004 | -1.94x | CA$-273.31K | CA$140.54K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-108.54K | CA$121.68K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2002 | -2.61x | CA$-138.41K | CA$53.02K | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2001 | -7.08x | CA$-200.21K | CA$28.29K | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2000 | -5.56x | CA$-241.08K | CA$43.35K | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1999 | -5.70x | CA$-217.22K | CA$38.12K | ▼ -1242.9% |
| 1998 | -0.42x | CA$-21.22K | CA$50.01K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | CA$-57.28K | CA$142.74K | — |