Sienna Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sienna Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sienna Resources Inc (SIE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.05x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-144.87K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$137.82K) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Sienna Resources Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sienna Resources Inc (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sienna Resources Inc from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sienna Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Sienna Resources Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Sienna Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Sienna Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sienna Resources Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SIE operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -3.41x | CA$-546.75K | CA$160.30K | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2023 | -4.93x | CA$-701.86K | CA$142.38K | ▼ -272.5% |
| 2022 | -1.32x | CA$-324.29K | CA$245.09K | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2021 | -6.58x | CA$-708.84K | CA$107.76K | ▼ -142.4% |
| 2020 | -2.71x | CA$-1.11 Million | CA$410.28K | ▼ -492.5% |
| 2019 | -0.46x | CA$-419.78K | CA$916.37K | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2018 | -1.51x | CA$-1.46 Million | CA$965.70K | ▼ -4139.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CA$-69.45K | CA$1.95 Million | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2016 | -0.29x | CA$-463.60K | CA$1.60 Million | ▼ -215.3% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | CA$-140.56K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | CA$-194.21K | CA$1.49 Million | ▼ -67.1% |
| 2013 | -0.08x | CA$-116.42K | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -2081.5% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$4.84K | CA$1.23 Million | ▲ +100.6% |
| 2011 | -0.68x | CA$-548.29K | CA$810.61K | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2010 | -2.64x | CA$-562.79K | CA$213.43K | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2009 | -4.04x | CA$-645.43K | CA$159.93K | ▼ -124.4% |
| 2008 | -1.80x | CA$-439.37K | CA$244.28K | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2007 | -2.38x | CA$-568.56K | CA$238.73K | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2006 | -1.87x | CA$-450.53K | CA$241.34K | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2005 | -7.34x | CA$-560.13K | CA$76.28K | ▼ -277.6% |
| 2004 | -1.94x | CA$-273.31K | CA$140.54K | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2003 | -0.89x | CA$-108.54K | CA$121.68K | ▲ +65.8% |
| 2002 | -2.61x | CA$-138.41K | CA$53.02K | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2001 | -7.08x | CA$-200.21K | CA$28.29K | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2000 | -5.56x | CA$-241.08K | CA$43.35K | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1999 | -5.70x | CA$-217.22K | CA$38.12K | ▼ -1242.9% |
| 1998 | -0.42x | CA$-21.22K | CA$50.01K | ▼ -5.7% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | CA$-57.28K | CA$142.74K | — |