Sirios Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Sirios Resources Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Sirios Resources Inc. (SOI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.11x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-692.59K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.42 Million) in one year. Check SOI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Sirios Resources Inc. (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Sirios Resources Inc. from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Sirios Resources Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Sirios Resources Inc. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Sirios Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Sirios Resources Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Sirios Resources Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Sirios Resources Inc. generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.88x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$2.18 Million | ▼ -651.1% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | CA$463.22K | CA$2.91 Million | ▲ +161.4% |
| 2022 | -0.26x | CA$-398.25K | CA$1.53 Million | ▲ +51.1% |
| 2021 | -0.53x | CA$-844.83K | CA$1.59 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2020 | -1.22x | CA$-842.10K | CA$691.24K | ▼ -58.7% |
| 2019 | -0.77x | CA$-1.06 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2018 | -0.89x | CA$-1.07 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2017 | -1.75x | CA$-987.66K | CA$565.61K | ▼ -39.6% |
| 2016 | -1.25x | CA$-920.56K | CA$735.72K | ▼ -97.6% |
| 2015 | -0.63x | CA$-462.30K | CA$729.95K | ▲ +18.3% |
| 2014 | -0.77x | CA$-652.27K | CA$841.84K | ▼ -90.6% |
| 2013 | -0.41x | CA$-516.25K | CA$1.27 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2012 | -1.84x | CA$-454.73K | CA$247.39K | ▼ -295.2% |
| 2011 | -0.47x | CA$-406.05K | CA$873.07K | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2010 | -0.83x | CA$-317.98K | CA$384.55K | ▼ -436.3% |
| 2009 | -0.15x | CA$-177.02K | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -268.3% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | CA$-80.96K | CA$1.93 Million | ▲ +88.6% |
| 2007 | -0.37x | CA$-572.86K | CA$1.56 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2006 | -0.42x | CA$-183.32K | CA$440.33K | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | CA$-148.61K | CA$307.09K | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2004 | -2.36x | CA$-160.07K | CA$67.91K | ▼ -1956.4% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | CA$12.89K | CA$101.48K | ▲ +109.7% |
| 2002 | -1.31x | CA$-111.50K | CA$85.10K | ▼ -1045.6% |
| 2001 | -0.11x | CA$-27.39K | CA$239.50K | ▲ +96.5% |
| 2000 | -3.24x | CA$-302.13K | CA$93.15K | ▼ -425.9% |
| 1999 | -0.62x | CA$-115.75K | CA$187.69K | ▼ -197.2% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | CA$-52.86K | CA$254.67K | ▲ +97.8% |
| 1997 | -9.64x | CA$-365.13K | CA$37.86K | ▼ -493.2% |
| 1996 | -1.63x | CA$-167.64K | CA$103.10K | — |