Tinka Resources Limited (TK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tinka Resources Limited (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.94x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-563.83K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$598.97K) in one year. Check Tinka Resources Limited investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tinka Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tinka Resources Limited across 28 annual periods. Also explore Tinka Resources Limited (TK) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tinka Resources Limited (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tinka Resources Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Tinka Resources Limited worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.24x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$816.02K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2024 | -3.00x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$437.69K | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2023 | -1.94x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$656.90K | ▼ -286.4% |
| 2022 | -0.50x | CA$-328.21K | CA$652.64K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2021 | -3.42x | CA$-2.04 Million | CA$596.20K | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2020 | -2.06x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$781.04K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | -1.68x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2018 | -3.28x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$588.20K | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2017 | -3.72x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$512.67K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2016 | -9.92x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$142.15K | ▼ -343.8% |
| 2015 | -2.23x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$550.98K | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2014 | -3.18x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$420.10K | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2013 | -4.79x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$255.03K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2012 | -6.35x | CA$-785.74K | CA$123.65K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2011 | -11.14x | CA$-649.09K | CA$58.28K | ▼ -197.2% |
| 2010 | -3.75x | CA$-343.37K | CA$91.63K | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | -5.32x | CA$-368.66K | CA$69.35K | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.02x | CA$-449.05K | CA$111.65K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2007 | -4.20x | CA$-440.26K | CA$104.90K | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | -5.73x | CA$-396.01K | CA$69.16K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2005 | -3.98x | CA$-284.19K | CA$71.46K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2004 | -17.78x | CA$-314.32K | CA$17.68K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2003 | -10.06x | CA$-162.27K | CA$16.13K | ▼ -1311.5% |
| 2002 | -0.71x | CA$-40.00K | CA$56.12K | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2001 | -8.77x | CA$-97.54K | CA$11.12K | ▼ -242.5% |
| 2000 | -2.56x | CA$-67.34K | CA$26.30K | ▲ +86.9% |
| 1999 | -19.49x | CA$-108.03K | CA$5.54K | ▼ -209.5% |
| 1998 | -6.30x | CA$-72.37K | CA$11.49K | — |