Tinka Resources Limited (TK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tinka Resources Limited (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.71x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-402.51K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$568.63K) in one year. See TK free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tinka Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tinka Resources Limited across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Tinka Resources Limited to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tinka Resources Limited (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tinka Resources Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tinka Resources Limited stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.24x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$816.02K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2024 | -3.00x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$437.69K | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2023 | -1.94x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$656.90K | ▼ -286.4% |
| 2022 | -0.50x | CA$-328.21K | CA$652.64K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2021 | -3.42x | CA$-2.04 Million | CA$596.20K | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2020 | -2.06x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$781.04K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | -1.68x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2018 | -3.28x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$588.20K | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2017 | -3.72x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$512.67K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2016 | -9.92x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$142.15K | ▼ -343.8% |
| 2015 | -2.23x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$550.98K | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2014 | -3.18x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$420.10K | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2013 | -4.79x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$255.03K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2012 | -6.35x | CA$-785.74K | CA$123.65K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2011 | -11.14x | CA$-649.09K | CA$58.28K | ▼ -197.2% |
| 2010 | -3.75x | CA$-343.37K | CA$91.63K | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | -5.32x | CA$-368.66K | CA$69.35K | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.02x | CA$-449.05K | CA$111.65K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2007 | -4.20x | CA$-440.26K | CA$104.90K | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | -5.73x | CA$-396.01K | CA$69.16K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2005 | -3.98x | CA$-284.19K | CA$71.46K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2004 | -17.78x | CA$-314.32K | CA$17.68K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2003 | -10.06x | CA$-162.27K | CA$16.13K | ▼ -1311.5% |
| 2002 | -0.71x | CA$-40.00K | CA$56.12K | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2001 | -8.77x | CA$-97.54K | CA$11.12K | ▼ -242.5% |
| 2000 | -2.56x | CA$-67.34K | CA$26.30K | ▲ +86.9% |
| 1999 | -19.49x | CA$-108.03K | CA$5.54K | ▼ -209.5% |
| 1998 | -6.30x | CA$-72.37K | CA$11.49K | — |