Tinka Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tinka Resources Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tinka Resources Limited (TK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.71x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-426.80K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$604.93K) in one year. Check how high is Tinka Resources Limited's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tinka Resources Limited (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tinka Resources Limited from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tinka Resources Limited across 28 annual periods. Check Tinka Resources Limited (TK) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tinka Resources Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Tinka Resources Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tinka Resources Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tinka Resources Limited cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.24x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$816.02K | ▲ +58.7% |
| 2024 | -3.00x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$437.69K | ▼ -54.2% |
| 2023 | -1.94x | CA$-1.28 Million | CA$656.90K | ▼ -286.4% |
| 2022 | -0.50x | CA$-328.21K | CA$652.64K | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2021 | -3.42x | CA$-2.04 Million | CA$596.20K | ▼ -66.3% |
| 2020 | -2.06x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$781.04K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2019 | -1.68x | CA$-1.75 Million | CA$1.04 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2018 | -3.28x | CA$-1.93 Million | CA$588.20K | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2017 | -3.72x | CA$-1.91 Million | CA$512.67K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2016 | -9.92x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$142.15K | ▼ -343.8% |
| 2015 | -2.23x | CA$-1.23 Million | CA$550.98K | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2014 | -3.18x | CA$-1.34 Million | CA$420.10K | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2013 | -4.79x | CA$-1.22 Million | CA$255.03K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2012 | -6.35x | CA$-785.74K | CA$123.65K | ▲ +42.9% |
| 2011 | -11.14x | CA$-649.09K | CA$58.28K | ▼ -197.2% |
| 2010 | -3.75x | CA$-343.37K | CA$91.63K | ▲ +29.5% |
| 2009 | -5.32x | CA$-368.66K | CA$69.35K | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.02x | CA$-449.05K | CA$111.65K | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2007 | -4.20x | CA$-440.26K | CA$104.90K | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | -5.73x | CA$-396.01K | CA$69.16K | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2005 | -3.98x | CA$-284.19K | CA$71.46K | ▲ +77.6% |
| 2004 | -17.78x | CA$-314.32K | CA$17.68K | ▼ -76.7% |
| 2003 | -10.06x | CA$-162.27K | CA$16.13K | ▼ -1311.5% |
| 2002 | -0.71x | CA$-40.00K | CA$56.12K | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2001 | -8.77x | CA$-97.54K | CA$11.12K | ▼ -242.5% |
| 2000 | -2.56x | CA$-67.34K | CA$26.30K | ▲ +86.9% |
| 1999 | -19.49x | CA$-108.03K | CA$5.54K | ▼ -209.5% |
| 1998 | -6.30x | CA$-72.37K | CA$11.49K | — |