Tower Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tower Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Tower Resources Ltd (TWR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.65x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-157.19K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$241.89K) in one year. Check Tower Resources Ltd cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Tower Resources Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Tower Resources Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Tower Resources Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check Tower Resources Ltd total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Tower Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Tower Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tower Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TWR cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.78x | CA$-435.88K | CA$560.64K | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2024 | -0.80x | CA$-320.81K | CA$403.50K | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2023 | -1.16x | CA$-328.47K | CA$282.46K | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2022 | -0.57x | CA$-245.95K | CA$434.62K | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2021 | -0.46x | CA$-234.68K | CA$509.29K | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2020 | -1.47x | CA$-286.41K | CA$194.62K | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2019 | -4.32x | CA$-285.06K | CA$66.06K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2018 | -11.58x | CA$-672.19K | CA$58.05K | ▼ -118.2% |
| 2017 | -5.31x | CA$-491.38K | CA$92.60K | ▼ -782.6% |
| 2016 | -0.60x | CA$-262.86K | CA$437.16K | ▲ +89.7% |
| 2015 | -5.83x | CA$-303.02K | CA$51.96K | ▼ -429.6% |
| 2014 | -1.10x | CA$-139.87K | CA$127.02K | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | CA$-262.33K | CA$294.50K | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2012 | -2.50x | CA$-639.24K | CA$255.31K | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2011 | -2.72x | CA$-290.06K | CA$106.83K | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2010 | -2.52x | CA$-169.10K | CA$67.23K | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2009 | -2.80x | CA$-154.54K | CA$55.18K | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2008 | -2.38x | CA$-127.71K | CA$53.76K | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2007 | -3.28x | CA$-212.94K | CA$64.83K | ▼ -128.9% |
| 2006 | -1.43x | CA$-283.69K | CA$197.71K | ▼ -27.1% |
| 2005 | -1.13x | CA$-236.79K | CA$209.79K | ▲ +61.6% |
| 2004 | -2.94x | CA$-314.15K | CA$106.89K | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2003 | -2.61x | CA$-360.42K | CA$138.27K | ▼ -3235.1% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | CA$-28.84K | CA$368.96K | ▼ -220.8% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | CA$8.47K | CA$130.83K | — |