Vulcan Minerals Inc. (VUL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vulcan Minerals Inc. (VUL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.65K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.03 Million) in one year. Explore Vulcan Minerals Inc. strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vulcan Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vulcan Minerals Inc. across 25 annual periods. Also explore Vulcan Minerals Inc. assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vulcan Minerals Inc. (1997–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vulcan Minerals Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Vulcan Minerals Inc. (VUL) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.15x | CA$-501.57K | CA$3.32 Million | ▼ -200.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | CA$-190.00K | CA$3.78 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | CA$-318.26K | CA$4.13 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2021 | -0.35x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$4.19 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2020 | -0.86x | CA$-262.43K | CA$304.66K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2019 | -1.47x | CA$-357.05K | CA$243.19K | ▲ +62.6% |
| 2018 | -3.93x | CA$-613.21K | CA$156.07K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2017 | -8.80x | CA$-707.92K | CA$80.44K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2016 | -5.93x | CA$-603.60K | CA$101.79K | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2015 | -5.08x | CA$-610.55K | CA$120.25K | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2014 | -7.93x | CA$-674.88K | CA$85.15K | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2013 | -10.95x | CA$-785.54K | CA$71.76K | ▼ -48878.8% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | CA$-9.75K | CA$436.06K | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$616.03K | ▼ -857.2% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | CA$-384.15K | CA$2.26 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2006 | -0.45x | CA$-461.32K | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | CA$-362.24K | CA$1.59 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2004 | -0.73x | CA$-204.40K | CA$279.27K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2003 | -2.39x | CA$-178.72K | CA$74.88K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2002 | -2.00x | CA$-179.86K | CA$89.94K | ▼ -135.0% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | CA$-198.20K | CA$232.93K | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2000 | -4.91x | CA$-101.99K | CA$20.78K | ▼ -317.4% |
| 1999 | -1.18x | CA$-79.03K | CA$67.23K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1998 | -8.76x | CA$-147.42K | CA$16.82K | ▼ -117.8% |
| 1997 | -4.02x | CA$-96.46K | CA$23.97K | — |