Vulcan Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vulcan Minerals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Vulcan Minerals Inc. (VUL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-143.65K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$3.03 Million) in one year. Check Vulcan Minerals Inc. cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Vulcan Minerals Inc. (1997–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Vulcan Minerals Inc. from 1997 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Vulcan Minerals Inc. across 25 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Vulcan Minerals Inc. reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Vulcan Minerals Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2024)
Vulcan Minerals Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vulcan Minerals Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see VUL cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.15x | CA$-501.57K | CA$3.32 Million | ▼ -200.4% |
| 2023 | -0.05x | CA$-190.00K | CA$3.78 Million | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | CA$-318.26K | CA$4.13 Million | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2021 | -0.35x | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$4.19 Million | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2020 | -0.86x | CA$-262.43K | CA$304.66K | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2019 | -1.47x | CA$-357.05K | CA$243.19K | ▲ +62.6% |
| 2018 | -3.93x | CA$-613.21K | CA$156.07K | ▲ +55.4% |
| 2017 | -8.80x | CA$-707.92K | CA$80.44K | ▼ -48.4% |
| 2016 | -5.93x | CA$-603.60K | CA$101.79K | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2015 | -5.08x | CA$-610.55K | CA$120.25K | ▲ +35.9% |
| 2014 | -7.93x | CA$-674.88K | CA$85.15K | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2013 | -10.95x | CA$-785.54K | CA$71.76K | ▼ -48878.8% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | CA$-9.75K | CA$436.06K | ▲ +98.6% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$616.03K | ▼ -857.2% |
| 2007 | -0.17x | CA$-384.15K | CA$2.26 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2006 | -0.45x | CA$-461.32K | CA$1.03 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | CA$-362.24K | CA$1.59 Million | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2004 | -0.73x | CA$-204.40K | CA$279.27K | ▲ +69.3% |
| 2003 | -2.39x | CA$-178.72K | CA$74.88K | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2002 | -2.00x | CA$-179.86K | CA$89.94K | ▼ -135.0% |
| 2001 | -0.85x | CA$-198.20K | CA$232.93K | ▲ +82.7% |
| 2000 | -4.91x | CA$-101.99K | CA$20.78K | ▼ -317.4% |
| 1999 | -1.18x | CA$-79.03K | CA$67.23K | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1998 | -8.76x | CA$-147.42K | CA$16.82K | ▼ -117.8% |
| 1997 | -4.02x | CA$-96.46K | CA$23.97K | — |