White Gold Corp (WGO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
White Gold Corp (WGO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-1.02 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$16.12 Million) in one year. See White Gold Corp (WGO) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
White Gold Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for White Gold Corp across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does White Gold Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for White Gold Corp (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for White Gold Corp. Check earnings quality score of White Gold Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.15x | CA$-2.47 Million | CA$16.12 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-1.41 Million | CA$15.17 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | CA$-1.73 Million | CA$14.26 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2022 | -0.08x | CA$-1.04 Million | CA$13.90 Million | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2021 | -0.22x | CA$-3.11 Million | CA$13.96 Million | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2020 | -0.18x | CA$-2.74 Million | CA$14.99 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2019 | -0.25x | CA$-3.16 Million | CA$12.51 Million | ▼ -0.6% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$15.65 Million | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2017 | -0.31x | CA$-3.63 Million | CA$11.58 Million | ▼ -140.7% |
| 2016 | 0.77x | CA$1.33 Million | CA$1.73 Million | ▲ +187.1% |
| 2015 | -0.88x | CA$-93.37K | CA$105.55K | ▼ -1328.9% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | CA$-34.97K | CA$564.79K | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2013 | -0.17x | CA$-77.94K | CA$450.88K | ▼ -1006.8% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | CA$9.48K | CA$497.24K | ▲ +102.0% |
| 2011 | -0.96x | CA$-329.99K | CA$344.63K | ▲ +91.5% |
| 2010 | -11.28x | CA$-1.37 Million | CA$121.39K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2009 | -6.72x | CA$-923.09K | CA$137.31K | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2008 | -3.89x | CA$-593.74K | CA$152.82K | ▼ -84.8% |
| 2007 | -2.10x | CA$-109.55K | CA$52.10K | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2006 | -2.27x | CA$-73.50K | CA$32.41K | ▼ -153.2% |
| 2005 | -0.90x | CA$-158.69K | CA$177.19K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2004 | -1.31x | CA$-152.66K | CA$116.75K | ▼ -366.4% |
| 2003 | 0.49x | CA$156.21K | CA$318.29K | ▲ +193.6% |
| 2002 | -0.52x | CA$-55.27K | CA$105.41K | ▼ -276.4% |
| 2001 | -0.14x | CA$-15.19K | CA$109.04K | ▲ +72.3% |
| 2000 | -0.50x | CA$-51.57K | CA$102.40K | — |