Patentus SA (PAT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.31x

Patentus SA (PAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.31x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of zł-8.33 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (zł27.07 Million) in one year. See PAT financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.31x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

zł-8.33 Million
PLN

Total Liabilities

zł27.07 Million
PLN

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Patentus SA Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Patentus SA across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Patentus SA.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Patentus SA (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Patentus SA. Check Patentus SA (PAT) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (PLN) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.88x zł33.94 Million zł38.40 Million ▲ +73.7%
2023 0.51x zł46.44 Million zł91.27 Million ▲ +110.1%
2022 0.24x zł9.37 Million zł38.67 Million ▲ +402.3%
2021 -0.08x zł-2.90 Million zł36.22 Million ▼ -115.0%
2020 0.54x zł23.11 Million zł43.13 Million ▲ +126.8%
2019 0.24x zł13.79 Million zł58.35 Million ▲ +644.5%
2018 -0.04x zł-3.67 Million zł84.63 Million ▲ +68.0%
2017 -0.14x zł-9.08 Million zł67.06 Million ▼ -179.6%
2016 0.17x zł10.24 Million zł60.24 Million ▲ +4280.4%
2015 0.00x zł303.00K zł78.05 Million ▼ -96.7%
2014 0.12x zł7.87 Million zł67.87 Million ▲ +64.2%
2013 0.07x zł4.70 Million zł66.56 Million ▼ -69.8%
2012 0.23x zł11.71 Million zł50.15 Million ▲ +214.5%
2011 -0.20x zł-11.51 Million zł56.44 Million ▼ -142.0%
2010 0.49x zł15.14 Million zł31.15 Million ▲ +341.9%
2009 0.11x zł2.58 Million zł23.49 Million ▼ -50.8%
2008 0.22x zł4.96 Million zł22.23 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.