Dierig Holding AG (DIE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2025: 0.05x

Dierig Holding AG (DIE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of €3.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (€76.08 Million) in one year. Explore DIE long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

€3.70 Million
EUR

Total Liabilities

€76.08 Million
EUR

Data as of

Jun 2025
Most recent filing

Dierig Holding AG Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Dierig Holding AG across 18 annual periods. Also explore DIE asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Dierig Holding AG (2007–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Dierig Holding AG. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Dierig Holding AG stock valuation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (EUR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.11x €7.44 Million €65.97 Million ▲ +0.9%
2023 0.11x €7.56 Million €67.64 Million ▲ +108.7%
2022 0.05x €3.50 Million €65.46 Million ▼ -46.7%
2021 0.10x €6.97 Million €69.36 Million ▼ -24.5%
2020 0.13x €10.49 Million €78.83 Million ▲ +25.0%
2019 0.11x €8.79 Million €82.57 Million ▲ +38.7%
2018 0.08x €6.41 Million €83.46 Million ▼ -12.4%
2017 0.09x €7.29 Million €83.15 Million ▲ +543.6%
2016 0.01x €1.22 Million €89.54 Million ▼ -76.2%
2015 0.06x €5.24 Million €91.56 Million ▲ +474.0%
2014 0.01x €787.00K €78.87 Million ▼ -42.5%
2013 0.02x €1.27 Million €73.04 Million ▼ -84.9%
2012 0.12x €8.44 Million €73.41 Million ▲ +1089.8%
2011 -0.01x €-876.00K €75.39 Million ▼ -106.9%
2010 0.17x €1.05 Million €6.28 Million ▼ -70.4%
2009 0.57x €2.05 Million €3.62 Million ▲ +1602.1%
2008 0.03x €2.57 Million €77.32 Million ▲ +29.2%
2007 0.03x €1.97 Million €76.69 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.