Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd (600326) — Defensive Interval Ratio
Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd (600326) has a Defensive Interval Ratio of 303 days as of September 2025. Defensive assets of CN¥4.07 Billion (cash CN¥-, short-term investments CN¥233.07 Million, receivables CN¥3.84 Billion) cover 303 days of daily cash needs of CN¥13.46 Million/day. See 600326 current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Defensive Interval Ratio
Defensive Assets
Daily Cash Need
Current Liabilities
Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd Defensive Interval Ratio (1997–2024)
This chart shows how Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd's Defensive Interval Ratio has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1997 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 303 days, meaning defensive assets of CN¥4.07 Billion can fund 303 days of operations without new revenue. See net asset quality index of Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Annual Defensive Interval Ratio for Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd (1997–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Defensive Interval Ratio for Tibet Tianlu Co Ltd from 1997 to 2024, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows defensive assets, daily cash need, the DIR in days, and the change in days compared to the prior year. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see 600326 company net worth.
| Year | DIR (days) | Defensive Assets (CNY) | Daily Cash Need | Cash | ST Investments | Change (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 276 days | CN¥4.13 Billion | CN¥14.98 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥364.56 Million | ▲ +10 days |
| 2023 | 266 days | CN¥3.89 Billion | CN¥14.64 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥326.51 Million | ▲ +2 days |
| 2022 | 263 days | CN¥3.76 Billion | CN¥14.28 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥472.73 Million | ▼ -33 days |
| 2021 | 296 days | CN¥3.50 Billion | CN¥11.80 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +40 days |
| 2020 | 257 days | CN¥2.70 Billion | CN¥10.53 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +107 days |
| 2019 | 150 days | CN¥1.65 Billion | CN¥11.02 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +57 days |
| 2018 | 93 days | CN¥719.09 Million | CN¥7.72 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +24 days |
| 2017 | 69 days | CN¥610.58 Million | CN¥8.84 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▼ -107 days |
| 2016 | 176 days | CN¥1.17 Billion | CN¥6.64 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥640.00 Million | ▲ +33 days |
| 2015 | 143 days | CN¥770.15 Million | CN¥5.39 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥172.00 Million | ▲ +21 days |
| 2014 | 122 days | CN¥549.99 Million | CN¥4.50 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▼ -30 days |
| 2013 | 152 days | CN¥560.60 Million | CN¥3.68 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +52 days |
| 2012 | 101 days | CN¥343.31 Million | CN¥3.41 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▼ -138 days |
| 2011 | 238 days | CN¥459.99 Million | CN¥1.93 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +42 days |
| 2010 | 197 days | CN¥373.55 Million | CN¥1.90 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▼ -11 days |
| 2009 | 208 days | CN¥332.47 Million | CN¥1.60 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +207 days |
| 2008 | 1 days | CN¥1.39 Million | CN¥1.66 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.12 Million | ▼ -9 days |
| 2007 | 10 days | CN¥15.27 Million | CN¥1.48 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥3.44 Million | ▼ -14 days |
| 2006 | 24 days | CN¥28.73 Million | CN¥1.19 Million/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▼ -172 days |
| 2005 | 196 days | CN¥169.17 Million | CN¥863.03K/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.39 Million | ▲ +8 days |
| 2004 | 188 days | CN¥164.69 Million | CN¥874.35K/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.20 Million | ▼ -37 days |
| 2003 | 225 days | CN¥120.21 Million | CN¥533.22K/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.52 Million | ▲ +25 days |
| 2002 | 200 days | CN¥119.45 Million | CN¥597.08K/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.79 Million | ▲ +105 days |
| 2001 | 95 days | CN¥34.28 Million | CN¥361.13K/day | CN¥- | CN¥2.58 Million | ▲ +89 days |
| 2000 | 6 days | CN¥2.26 Million | CN¥394.04K/day | CN¥- | CN¥2.05 Million | ▲ +2 days |
| 1999 | 4 days | CN¥1.30 Million | CN¥318.75K/day | CN¥- | CN¥1.00 Million | ▼ -174 days |
| 1998 | 178 days | CN¥55.57 Million | CN¥311.93K/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | ▲ +115 days |
| 1997 | 63 days | CN¥19.40 Million | CN¥306.40K/day | CN¥- | CN¥- | — |