Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (AEHL) — Net Asset Quality Index
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (AEHL) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 72.5% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $264.21 Million minus total liabilities of $72.73 Million yields net assets of $191.48 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check AEHL asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 72.5%, representing net assets of $191.48 Million against total assets of $264.21 Million USD. See AEHL working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see how much is Antelope Enterprise Holdings Ltd worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72.5% | $191.48 Million | $264.21 Million | $72.73 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2024 | 69.0% | $26.24 Million | $38.01 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -15.1 pp |
| 2023 | 84.1% | $102.24 Million | $121.50 Million | $19.26 Million | ▲ +78.3 pp |
| 2022 | 5.9% | $6.46 Million | $110.01 Million | $103.54 Million | ▼ -22.0 pp |
| 2021 | 27.9% | $49.56 Million | $177.87 Million | $128.31 Million | ▼ -15.3 pp |
| 2020 | 43.2% | $97.35 Million | $225.39 Million | $128.04 Million | ▼ -32.1 pp |
| 2019 | 75.3% | $272.89 Million | $362.28 Million | $89.39 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 75.2% | $276.02 Million | $366.94 Million | $90.92 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2017 | 84.2% | $694.74 Million | $825.42 Million | $130.68 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 82.9% | $772.45 Million | $931.28 Million | $158.83 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2015 | 82.8% | $1.09 Billion | $1.31 Billion | $226.18 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 83.5% | $1.45 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $285.94 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2013 | 82.2% | $1.42 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $306.67 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2012 | 86.3% | $1.44 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $228.21 Million | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2011 | 69.7% | $1.19 Billion | $1.71 Billion | $518.21 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2010 | 72.3% | $882.24 Million | $1.22 Billion | $338.25 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2009 | 67.4% | $504.42 Million | $748.23 Million | $243.81 Million | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2008 | 64.4% | $555.23 Million | $862.62 Million | $307.39 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 64.3% | $591.99 Million | $920.59 Million | $328.59 Million | — |