Aemetis Inc (AMTX) — Net Asset Quality Index
Aemetis Inc (AMTX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -118.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $270.33 Million minus total liabilities of $591.47 Million yields net assets of $-321.14 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Aemetis Inc (AMTX) liquid assets ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Aemetis Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2004–2025)
This chart shows how Aemetis Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 22 annual periods from 2004 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at -118.8%, representing net assets of $-321.14 Million against total assets of $270.33 Million USD. See AMTX working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Aemetis Inc (2004–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Aemetis Inc from 2004 to 2025, covering 22 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see AMTX stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -118.1% | $-306.83 Million | $259.84 Million | $566.67 Million | ▼ -16.3 pp |
| 2024 | -101.8% | $-263.93 Million | $259.30 Million | $523.23 Million | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2023 | -89.1% | $-216.98 Million | $243.41 Million | $460.38 Million | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2022 | -97.5% | $-201.85 Million | $207.11 Million | $408.97 Million | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2021 | -74.8% | $-120.24 Million | $160.83 Million | $281.07 Million | ▲ +72.9 pp |
| 2020 | -147.6% | $-184.74 Million | $125.14 Million | $309.88 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 2019 | -154.5% | $-154.37 Million | $99.90 Million | $254.27 Million | ▼ -39.5 pp |
| 2018 | -115.0% | $-105.58 Million | $91.82 Million | $197.40 Million | ▼ -31.9 pp |
| 2017 | -83.1% | $-78.39 Million | $94.33 Million | $172.72 Million | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2016 | -64.0% | $-49.81 Million | $77.81 Million | $127.62 Million | ▼ -21.6 pp |
| 2015 | -42.5% | $-35.29 Million | $83.14 Million | $118.44 Million | ▼ -39.1 pp |
| 2014 | -3.3% | $-2.97 Million | $89.18 Million | $92.15 Million | ▲ +9.8 pp |
| 2013 | -13.1% | $-12.77 Million | $97.14 Million | $109.91 Million | ▲ +68.4 pp |
| 2012 | -81.6% | $-22.20 Million | $27.22 Million | $49.42 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | -81.6% | $-22.20 Million | $27.22 Million | $49.42 Million | ▼ -37.8 pp |
| 2010 | -43.8% | $-9.45 Million | $21.59 Million | $31.04 Million | ▼ -24.9 pp |
| 2009 | -18.9% | $-3.69 Million | $19.57 Million | $23.26 Million | ▼ -40.1 pp |
| 2008 | 21.2% | $4.99 Million | $23.54 Million | $18.54 Million | ▼ -48.9 pp |
| 2007 | 70.1% | $23.53 Million | $33.55 Million | $10.02 Million | ▲ +814.9 pp |
| 2006 | -744.8% | $-80.39K | $10.79K | $91.19K | ▼ -833.7 pp |
| 2005 | 88.9% | $9.59K | $10.79K | $1.20K | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2004 | 96.7% | $19.28K | $19.93K | $648.00 | — |