BTCS Inc (BTCS) — Net Asset Quality Index
BTCS Inc (BTCS) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 75.4% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $298.86 Million minus total liabilities of $73.45 Million yields net assets of $225.40 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check BTCS asset liquidity ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
BTCS Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2024)
This chart shows how BTCS Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2008 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 75.4%, representing net assets of $225.40 Million against total assets of $298.86 Million USD. See working capital to net assets of BTCS Inc to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for BTCS Inc (2008–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for BTCS Inc from 2008 to 2024, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see BTCS Inc (BTCS) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 88.9% | $34.00 Million | $38.25 Million | $4.25 Million | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2023 | 96.4% | $26.17 Million | $27.15 Million | $980.90K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2022 | 94.1% | $9.33 Million | $9.92 Million | $586.41K | ▲ +8.3 pp |
| 2021 | 85.8% | $12.10 Million | $14.10 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +18.6 pp |
| 2020 | 67.2% | $1.04 Million | $1.55 Million | $508.61K | ▲ +110.8 pp |
| 2019 | -43.6% | $-183.76K | $421.35K | $605.11K | ▲ +361.7 pp |
| 2018 | -405.4% | $-255.99K | $63.15K | $319.15K | ▼ -492.5 pp |
| 2017 | 87.1% | $513.43K | $589.42K | $76.00K | ▲ +46227.7 pp |
| 2016 | -46140.6% | $-45.25 Million | $98.07K | $45.35 Million | ▼ -46054.3 pp |
| 2015 | -86.3% | $-2.79 Million | $3.23 Million | $6.02 Million | ▼ -89.1 pp |
| 2014 | 2.8% | $7.68K | $273.80K | $266.12K | ▲ +84.5 pp |
| 2013 | -81.7% | $-490.86K | $601.12K | $1.09 Million | ▲ +10.5 pp |
| 2012 | -92.2% | $-542.24K | $588.12K | $1.13 Million | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2011 | -97.0% | $-356.82K | $367.87K | $724.69K | ▼ -96.7 pp |
| 2010 | -0.3% | $-7.00K | $2.13 Million | $2.14 Million | ▲ +85.5 pp |
| 2009 | -85.8% | $-16.55K | $19.28K | $35.83K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | -85.8% | $-16.55K | $19.28K | $35.83K | — |