Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) — Net Asset Quality Index
Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 70.2% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $48.51 Million minus total liabilities of $14.44 Million yields net assets of $34.07 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See DMRC defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Digimarc Corporation Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Digimarc Corporation's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 70.2%, representing net assets of $34.07 Million against total assets of $48.51 Million USD. Explore Digimarc Corporation operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Digimarc Corporation (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Digimarc Corporation from 2006 to 2025, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see DMRC market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 76.0% | $40.23 Million | $52.96 Million | $12.73 Million | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2024 | 81.0% | $61.36 Million | $75.77 Million | $14.41 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2023 | 76.9% | $61.93 Million | $80.55 Million | $18.62 Million | ▼ -8.9 pp |
| 2022 | 85.8% | $97.59 Million | $113.78 Million | $16.19 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2021 | 85.4% | $55.38 Million | $64.88 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -1.0 pp |
| 2020 | 86.4% | $83.84 Million | $97.03 Million | $13.19 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2019 | 86.2% | $49.45 Million | $57.39 Million | $7.94 Million | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2018 | 91.6% | $56.62 Million | $61.79 Million | $5.17 Million | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2017 | 93.2% | $82.35 Million | $88.37 Million | $6.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 93.1% | $73.33 Million | $78.74 Million | $5.40 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 91.3% | $51.46 Million | $56.36 Million | $4.91 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 90.9% | $52.17 Million | $57.42 Million | $5.24 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2013 | 89.0% | $50.92 Million | $57.20 Million | $6.27 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2012 | 92.5% | $53.00 Million | $57.33 Million | $4.33 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2011 | 91.1% | $41.72 Million | $45.79 Million | $4.08 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 91.7% | $51.16 Million | $55.77 Million | $4.61 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 92.4% | $46.66 Million | $50.48 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 92.3% | $48.40 Million | $52.44 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2007 | 90.6% | $34.84 Million | $38.45 Million | $3.61 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2006 | 91.9% | $34.59 Million | $37.66 Million | $3.06 Million | — |