Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 27.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $9.99 Billion minus total liabilities of $7.21 Billion yields net assets of $2.78 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check financial resilience of Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2025)
This chart shows how Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 27.8%, representing net assets of $2.78 Billion against total assets of $9.99 Billion USD. See GLXY net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (2005–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd from 2005 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see GLXY stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.7% | $3.03 Billion | $11.35 Billion | $8.31 Billion | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2024 | 30.8% | $2.19 Billion | $7.12 Billion | $4.93 Billion | ▼ -58.4 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $781.03 Million | $875.24 Million | $94.20 Million | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2022 | 75.9% | $299.31 Million | $394.27 Million | $94.97 Million | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2021 | 88.5% | $786.29 Million | $888.78 Million | $102.48 Million | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2017 | 67.5% | $217.79K | $322.65K | $104.86K | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2016 | 91.2% | $381.72K | $418.48K | $36.76K | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2015 | 94.9% | $500.08K | $527.12K | $27.04K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 94.5% | $662.90K | $701.39K | $38.48K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2013 | 96.8% | $784.65K | $810.32K | $25.66K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.3% | $971.47K | $998.91K | $27.44K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 96.9% | $1.17 Million | $1.20 Million | $37.45K | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2008 | 82.3% | $7.40 Million | $9.00 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2007 | 91.0% | $18.49 Million | $20.32 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2006 | 85.2% | $7.99 Million | $9.37 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +131.5 pp |
| 2005 | -46.3% | $-250.30K | $540.34K | $790.64K | — |