Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 25.1% as of June 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $10.84 Billion minus total liabilities of $8.12 Billion yields net assets of $2.72 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read how much debt does Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd carry for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2025)
This chart shows how Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of June 2026, the index stands at 25.1%, representing net assets of $2.72 Billion against total assets of $10.84 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd stock valuation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (2005–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd from 2005 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check GLXY strategic assets to equity ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.7% | $3.03 Billion | $11.35 Billion | $8.31 Billion | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2024 | 30.8% | $2.19 Billion | $7.12 Billion | $4.93 Billion | ▼ -58.4 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $781.03 Million | $875.24 Million | $94.20 Million | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2022 | 75.9% | $299.31 Million | $394.27 Million | $94.97 Million | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2021 | 88.5% | $786.29 Million | $888.78 Million | $102.48 Million | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2017 | 67.5% | $217.79K | $322.65K | $104.86K | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2016 | 91.2% | $381.72K | $418.48K | $36.76K | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2015 | 94.9% | $500.08K | $527.12K | $27.04K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 94.5% | $662.90K | $701.39K | $38.48K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2013 | 96.8% | $784.65K | $810.32K | $25.66K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.3% | $971.47K | $998.91K | $27.44K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 96.9% | $1.17 Million | $1.20 Million | $37.45K | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2008 | 82.3% | $7.40 Million | $9.00 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2007 | 91.0% | $18.49 Million | $20.32 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2006 | 85.2% | $7.99 Million | $9.37 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +131.5 pp |
| 2005 | -46.3% | $-250.30K | $540.34K | $790.64K | — |