Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) — Net Asset Quality Index
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (GLXY) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 27.8% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $9.99 Billion minus total liabilities of $7.21 Billion yields net assets of $2.78 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See operational self-sufficiency of Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2025)
This chart shows how Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 27.8%, representing net assets of $2.78 Billion against total assets of $9.99 Billion USD. Explore how efficiently does Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd generate cash to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd (2005–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd from 2005 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market cap of Galaxy Digital Holdings Ltd.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.7% | $3.03 Billion | $11.35 Billion | $8.31 Billion | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2024 | 30.8% | $2.19 Billion | $7.12 Billion | $4.93 Billion | ▼ -58.4 pp |
| 2023 | 89.2% | $781.03 Million | $875.24 Million | $94.20 Million | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 2022 | 75.9% | $299.31 Million | $394.27 Million | $94.97 Million | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2021 | 88.5% | $786.29 Million | $888.78 Million | $102.48 Million | ▲ +21.0 pp |
| 2017 | 67.5% | $217.79K | $322.65K | $104.86K | ▼ -23.7 pp |
| 2016 | 91.2% | $381.72K | $418.48K | $36.76K | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2015 | 94.9% | $500.08K | $527.12K | $27.04K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 94.5% | $662.90K | $701.39K | $38.48K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2013 | 96.8% | $784.65K | $810.32K | $25.66K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 97.3% | $971.47K | $998.91K | $27.44K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2011 | 96.9% | $1.17 Million | $1.20 Million | $37.45K | ▲ +14.6 pp |
| 2008 | 82.3% | $7.40 Million | $9.00 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2007 | 91.0% | $18.49 Million | $20.32 Million | $1.84 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2006 | 85.2% | $7.99 Million | $9.37 Million | $1.38 Million | ▲ +131.5 pp |
| 2005 | -46.3% | $-250.30K | $540.34K | $790.64K | — |