Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc (LIXTW) — Net Asset Quality Index
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc (LIXTW) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 90.4% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $5.43 Million minus total liabilities of $521.42K yields net assets of $4.91 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check financial resilience of Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2005–2024)
This chart shows how Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 20 annual periods from 2005 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 90.4%, representing net assets of $4.91 Million against total assets of $5.43 Million USD. See how liquid is Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc (2005–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Lixte Biotechnology Holdings Inc from 2005 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see LIXTW stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 72.2% | $827.22K | $1.15 Million | $318.28K | ▼ -20.5 pp |
| 2023 | 92.7% | $3.99 Million | $4.31 Million | $313.86K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2022 | 92.9% | $5.17 Million | $5.56 Million | $394.79K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2021 | 94.1% | $4.79 Million | $5.09 Million | $302.93K | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2020 | 95.9% | $5.01 Million | $5.23 Million | $216.52K | ▲ +4.8 pp |
| 2019 | 91.1% | $2.43 Million | $2.67 Million | $237.90K | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2018 | 95.1% | $4.13 Million | $4.34 Million | $210.91K | ▲ +22.4 pp |
| 2017 | 72.7% | $995.04K | $1.37 Million | $373.02K | ▲ +23.2 pp |
| 2016 | 49.6% | $214.76K | $433.41K | $218.65K | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 2015 | 52.2% | $312.33K | $597.98K | $285.64K | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2014 | 49.3% | $265.86K | $539.30K | $273.44K | ▲ +7.0 pp |
| 2013 | 42.3% | $236.27K | $558.04K | $321.77K | ▼ -42.8 pp |
| 2012 | 85.1% | $1.49 Million | $1.75 Million | $261.15K | ▲ +66.7 pp |
| 2011 | 18.4% | $79.02K | $429.77K | $350.75K | ▼ -71.5 pp |
| 2010 | 89.9% | $1.74 Million | $1.93 Million | $195.06K | ▲ +8.7 pp |
| 2009 | 81.2% | $1.30 Million | $1.60 Million | $300.26K | ▲ +707.6 pp |
| 2008 | -626.4% | $-323.55K | $51.65K | $375.20K | ▼ -686.3 pp |
| 2007 | 59.9% | $376.93K | $629.11K | $252.18K | ▼ -23.5 pp |
| 2006 | 83.4% | $626.56K | $751.07K | $124.50K | ▲ +253.3 pp |
| 2005 | -169.9% | $-7.87K | $4.63K | $12.50K | — |