Mill City Ventures III Ltd (MCVT) — Net Asset Quality Index
Mill City Ventures III Ltd (MCVT) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.1% as of June 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $20.45 Million minus total liabilities of $191.09K yields net assets of $20.26 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Mill City Ventures III Ltd (MCVT) asset resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Mill City Ventures III Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Mill City Ventures III Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of June 2025, the index stands at 99.1%, representing net assets of $20.26 Million against total assets of $20.45 Million USD. See MCVT working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Mill City Ventures III Ltd (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Mill City Ventures III Ltd from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see MCVT company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.5% | $19.76 Million | $20.47 Million | $715.45K | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2023 | 97.3% | $18.59 Million | $19.11 Million | $516.43K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 98.8% | $18.34 Million | $18.57 Million | $223.23K | ▲ +18.5 pp |
| 2021 | 80.3% | $13.41 Million | $16.70 Million | $3.28 Million | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2020 | 93.0% | $11.64 Million | $12.51 Million | $870.00K | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2019 | 99.3% | $10.07 Million | $10.14 Million | $69.97K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2018 | 99.6% | $11.28 Million | $11.32 Million | $41.12K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 98.4% | $9.63 Million | $9.78 Million | $153.98K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2016 | 99.6% | $9.39 Million | $9.42 Million | $36.47K | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2015 | 98.9% | $8.74 Million | $8.83 Million | $92.82K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 99.6% | $11.47 Million | $11.52 Million | $46.09K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 99.7% | $10.52 Million | $10.55 Million | $26.65K | ▲ +89.3 pp |
| 2012 | 10.4% | $63.08K | $603.62K | $540.55K | ▲ +864.6 pp |
| 2011 | -854.1% | $-194.89K | $22.82K | $217.70K | ▲ +2912.2 pp |
| 2010 | -3766.3% | $-116.04K | $3.08K | $119.12K | ▼ -3548.3 pp |
| 2009 | -218.0% | $-37.99K | $17.43K | $55.41K | ▼ -316.7 pp |
| 2008 | 98.7% | $165.21K | $167.39K | $2.18K | ▲ +21.8 pp |
| 2007 | 76.9% | $66.83K | $86.93K | $20.10K | — |