Up Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Up Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 10.6% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $8.23 Billion minus total liabilities of $7.36 Billion yields net assets of $870.18 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check TIGR asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Up Fintech Holding Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1999–2025)
This chart shows how Up Fintech Holding Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 26 annual periods from 1999 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 10.6%, representing net assets of $870.18 Million against total assets of $8.23 Billion USD. See Up Fintech Holding Ltd short-term liquidity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Up Fintech Holding Ltd (1999–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Up Fintech Holding Ltd from 1999 to 2025, covering 26 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Up Fintech Holding Ltd (TIGR) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10.6% | $870.18 Million | $8.23 Billion | $7.36 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2024 | 10.4% | $662.12 Million | $6.39 Billion | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2023 | 13.2% | $495.42 Million | $3.75 Billion | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2022 | 11.8% | $446.99 Million | $3.80 Billion | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2021 | 13.4% | $446.63 Million | $3.32 Billion | $2.87 Billion | ▲ +2.7 pp |
| 2020 | 10.8% | $235.69 Million | $2.19 Billion | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -15.4 pp |
| 2019 | 26.2% | $211.94 Million | $809.06 Million | $597.12 Million | ▲ +48.7 pp |
| 2018 | -22.5% | $-25.88 Million | $115.22 Million | $141.09 Million | ▲ +20.0 pp |
| 2017 | -42.5% | $-15.30 Million | $36.00 Million | $51.30 Million | ▼ -129.5 pp |
| 2016 | 87.0% | $21.19 Million | $24.36 Million | $3.17 Million | ▲ +15.6 pp |
| 2014 | 71.4% | $9.56 Million | $13.38 Million | $3.83 Million | ▼ -19.1 pp |
| 2013 | 90.5% | $37.78 Million | $41.74 Million | $3.96 Million | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 2012 | 85.0% | $34.99 Million | $41.15 Million | $6.16 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2011 | 84.0% | $31.76 Million | $37.81 Million | $6.05 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 84.6% | $33.87 Million | $40.04 Million | $6.17 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2009 | 85.1% | $35.31 Million | $41.50 Million | $6.19 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2008 | 83.6% | $34.55 Million | $41.33 Million | $6.78 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2007 | 79.0% | $35.08 Million | $44.39 Million | $9.32 Million | ▲ +55.1 pp |
| 2006 | 23.9% | $9.92 Million | $41.54 Million | $31.62 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2005 | 24.5% | $10.10 Million | $41.16 Million | $31.06 Million | ▼ -3.6 pp |
| 2004 | 28.2% | $11.77 Million | $41.81 Million | $30.04 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2003 | 24.2% | $9.79 Million | $40.45 Million | $30.66 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 24.0% | $9.81 Million | $40.89 Million | $31.09 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2001 | 28.2% | $11.54 Million | $40.96 Million | $29.42 Million | ▼ -26.1 pp |
| 2000 | 54.2% | $28.67 Million | $52.85 Million | $24.19 Million | ▲ +59.4 pp |
| 1999 | -5.1% | $-163.00K | $3.18 Million | $3.34 Million | — |