Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR Net Asset Quality Index
Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR net asset quality index. Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR (WAVE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 67.4% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $8.14 Million minus total liabilities of $2.65 Million yields net assets of $5.49 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See what is Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR (2005–2025)
Net asset quality index of Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR from 2005 to 2025. This chart shows how Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 16 annual periods from 2005 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 67.4%, representing net assets of $5.49 Million against total assets of $8.14 Million USD. Check asset allocation strategy of Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR Net Asset Quality Index by Year (2005–2025)
Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR net asset quality index by year from 2005 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR from 2005 to 2025, covering 16 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Eco Wave Power Global AB ADR (WAVE) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 67.4% | $5.49 Million | $8.14 Million | $2.65 Million | ▼ -10.3 pp |
| 2024 | 77.7% | $8.30 Million | $10.68 Million | $2.38 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 77.9% | $7.80 Million | $10.01 Million | $2.21 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2022 | 82.9% | $9.87 Million | $11.92 Million | $2.04 Million | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2021 | 88.5% | $14.73 Million | $16.65 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2020 | 85.0% | $10.78 Million | $12.68 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2019 | 83.7% | $11.33 Million | $13.54 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +91.9 pp |
| 2018 | -8.2% | $-123.41K | $1.51 Million | $1.63 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 2017 | -5.3% | $-86.34K | $1.64 Million | $1.73 Million | ▲ +137.3 pp |
| 2011 | -142.5% | $-660.77 Million | $463.67 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▼ -62.4 pp |
| 2010 | -80.1% | $-398.17 Million | $497.15 Million | $895.32 Million | ▼ -34.4 pp |
| 2009 | -45.7% | $-275.66 Million | $602.79 Million | $878.45 Million | ▼ -38.3 pp |
| 2008 | -7.4% | $-56.12 Million | $757.51 Million | $813.63 Million | ▼ -55.1 pp |
| 2007 | 47.7% | $600.75 Million | $1.26 Billion | $657.99 Million | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2006 | 52.4% | $470.23 Million | $897.08 Million | $426.85 Million | ▼ -40.8 pp |
| 2005 | 93.2% | $540.43 Million | $579.77 Million | $39.34 Million | — |