Eaton Vance New York MBF (ENX) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance New York MBF (ENX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 67.6% as of March 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $267.47 Million minus total liabilities of $86.56 Million yields net assets of $180.91 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Eaton Vance New York MBF defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eaton Vance New York MBF Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2024)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance New York MBF's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of March 2025, the index stands at 67.6%, representing net assets of $180.91 Million against total assets of $267.47 Million USD. Explore Eaton Vance New York MBF operating cash flow efficiency to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance New York MBF (2006–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance New York MBF from 2006 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see ENX market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 69.0% | $195.81 Million | $283.90 Million | $88.09 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2023 | 62.4% | $174.41 Million | $279.47 Million | $105.06 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2022 | 55.3% | $178.05 Million | $321.70 Million | $143.65 Million | ▼ -9.9 pp |
| 2021 | 65.2% | $240.45 Million | $368.54 Million | $128.09 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 2020 | 61.0% | $240.04 Million | $393.25 Million | $153.20 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2019 | 61.1% | $244.32 Million | $399.84 Million | $155.52 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2018 | 57.6% | $199.93 Million | $346.81 Million | $146.88 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 58.9% | $213.18 Million | $362.11 Million | $148.92 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 60.7% | $223.81 Million | $368.54 Million | $144.73 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2015 | 61.6% | $218.28 Million | $354.23 Million | $135.95 Million | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2014 | 58.3% | $220.19 Million | $377.75 Million | $157.56 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2013 | 58.6% | $202.45 Million | $345.66 Million | $143.20 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2012 | 63.7% | $229.79 Million | $360.59 Million | $130.80 Million | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 2011 | 58.8% | $209.00 Million | $355.16 Million | $146.16 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2010 | 60.0% | $215.45 Million | $359.20 Million | $143.74 Million | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2008 | 56.6% | $183.64 Million | $324.69 Million | $141.04 Million | ▼ -40.0 pp |
| 2007 | 96.6% | $375.19 Million | $388.59 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -3.4 pp |
| 2006 | 99.9% | $380.22 Million | $380.53 Million | $307.71K | — |