Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc (GRF) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc (GRF) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 99.9% as of June 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $47.80 Million minus total liabilities of $69.91K yields net assets of $47.73 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2024)
This chart shows how Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of June 2025, the index stands at 99.9%, representing net assets of $47.73 Million against total assets of $47.80 Million USD. Explore cash flow conversion of Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc (2006–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc from 2006 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Eagle Capital Growth Fund Inc (GRF) market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.9% | $45.78 Million | $45.84 Million | $63.11K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 99.8% | $42.94 Million | $43.00 Million | $64.73K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 99.8% | $39.71 Million | $39.78 Million | $64.16K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 99.9% | $43.03 Million | $43.09 Million | $59.82K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 99.9% | $38.84 Million | $38.90 Million | $54.25K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $37.58 Million | $37.58 Million | $5.85K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 99.8% | $31.71 Million | $31.76 Million | $47.98K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 99.9% | $34.06 Million | $34.11 Million | $46.67K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 99.8% | $29.64 Million | $29.69 Million | $46.66K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 99.8% | $27.79 Million | $27.83 Million | $43.02K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 99.8% | $28.11 Million | $28.16 Million | $44.85K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 99.8% | $27.16 Million | $27.21 Million | $47.65K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2012 | 96.6% | $23.80 Million | $24.64 Million | $844.02K | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2011 | 99.8% | $22.24 Million | $22.29 Million | $46.07K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 99.8% | $23.23 Million | $23.28 Million | $43.27K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 99.7% | $17.05 Million | $17.10 Million | $48.21K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 99.8% | $24.99 Million | $25.04 Million | $48.95K | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2006 | 93.1% | $26.66 Million | $28.63 Million | $1.97 Million | — |