Mexican Gold Corp (MEX) — Net Asset Quality Index
Mexican Gold Corp (MEX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -243.1% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$39.13K minus total liabilities of CA$134.27K yields net assets of CA$-95.14K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Mexican Gold Corp liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Mexican Gold Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2007–2025)
This chart shows how Mexican Gold Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2007 to 2025. As of September 2025, the index stands at -243.1%, representing net assets of CA$-95.14K against total assets of CA$39.13K CAD. See working capital position of Mexican Gold Corp to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Mexican Gold Corp (2007–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Mexican Gold Corp from 2007 to 2025, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see how much is Mexican Gold Corp worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26.0% | CA$13.44K | CA$51.71K | CA$38.27K | ▼ -65.6 pp |
| 2024 | 91.6% | CA$212.55K | CA$231.96K | CA$19.41K | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2023 | 85.9% | CA$590.22K | CA$686.90K | CA$96.68K | ▲ +43.3 pp |
| 2022 | 42.6% | CA$63.30K | CA$148.49K | CA$85.19K | ▼ -16.2 pp |
| 2021 | 58.8% | CA$213.20K | CA$362.49K | CA$149.29K | ▼ -37.7 pp |
| 2020 | 96.5% | CA$1.90 Million | CA$1.97 Million | CA$69.13K | ▲ +119.4 pp |
| 2019 | -22.9% | CA$-165.35K | CA$721.16K | CA$886.50K | ▼ -103.2 pp |
| 2018 | 80.3% | CA$645.18K | CA$803.48K | CA$158.31K | ▼ -9.9 pp |
| 2017 | 90.2% | CA$1.26 Million | CA$1.39 Million | CA$136.19K | ▲ +986.3 pp |
| 2016 | -896.1% | CA$-644.21K | CA$71.89K | CA$716.11K | ▼ -958.1 pp |
| 2015 | 62.0% | CA$290.84K | CA$469.00K | CA$178.15K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2014 | 64.3% | CA$505.44K | CA$786.41K | CA$280.97K | ▼ -23.9 pp |
| 2013 | 88.2% | CA$579.79K | CA$657.53K | CA$77.74K | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2012 | 84.0% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.52 Million | CA$402.45K | ▼ -6.8 pp |
| 2011 | 90.8% | CA$3.94 Million | CA$4.34 Million | CA$397.39K | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2010 | 82.7% | CA$294.83K | CA$356.69K | CA$61.87K | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2009 | 98.2% | CA$3.64 Million | CA$3.71 Million | CA$67.90K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.3% | CA$4.86 Million | CA$4.94 Million | CA$85.24K | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2007 | 98.6% | CA$1.29 Million | CA$1.31 Million | CA$19.04K | — |