Sokoman Minerals Corp (SIC) — Net Asset Quality Index
Sokoman Minerals Corp (SIC) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 95.3% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$5.14 Million minus total liabilities of CA$241.75K yields net assets of CA$4.90 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Sokoman Minerals Corp asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Sokoman Minerals Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2024)
This chart shows how Sokoman Minerals Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2006 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 95.3%, representing net assets of CA$4.90 Million against total assets of CA$5.14 Million CAD. See working capital position of Sokoman Minerals Corp to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Sokoman Minerals Corp (2006–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Sokoman Minerals Corp from 2006 to 2024, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see SIC stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 96.7% | CA$7.79 Million | CA$8.06 Million | CA$264.29K | ▲ +18.0 pp |
| 2023 | 78.8% | CA$5.28 Million | CA$6.70 Million | CA$1.42 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2022 | 86.7% | CA$10.86 Million | CA$12.52 Million | CA$1.66 Million | ▼ -9.5 pp |
| 2021 | 96.2% | CA$16.36 Million | CA$17.00 Million | CA$646.15K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2020 | 95.0% | CA$3.41 Million | CA$3.59 Million | CA$179.87K | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2019 | 98.0% | CA$3.83 Million | CA$3.91 Million | CA$78.42K | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2018 | 95.4% | CA$1.36 Million | CA$1.43 Million | CA$66.25K | ▲ +6.2 pp |
| 2017 | 89.1% | CA$603.02K | CA$676.52K | CA$73.50K | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 2016 | 83.0% | CA$279.72K | CA$336.96K | CA$57.24K | ▼ -5.0 pp |
| 2015 | 88.0% | CA$452.67K | CA$514.53K | CA$61.86K | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2014 | 91.2% | CA$487.42K | CA$534.73K | CA$47.31K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2013 | 89.7% | CA$724.30K | CA$807.37K | CA$83.07K | ▲ +11.7 pp |
| 2012 | 78.1% | CA$853.34K | CA$1.09 Million | CA$239.85K | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2011 | 91.9% | CA$1.45 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$128.37K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2010 | 90.6% | CA$1.23 Million | CA$1.36 Million | CA$128.24K | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2009 | 94.7% | CA$502.35K | CA$530.63K | CA$28.28K | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2008 | 83.3% | CA$94.03K | CA$112.90K | CA$18.86K | ▼ -12.0 pp |
| 2007 | 95.3% | CA$246.56K | CA$258.79K | CA$12.23K | ▲ +20.3 pp |
| 2006 | 75.0% | CA$104.88K | CA$139.88K | CA$35.00K | — |