Sky Gold Corp (SKYG) — Net Asset Quality Index
Sky Gold Corp (SKYG) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 76.2% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$1.62 Million minus total liabilities of CA$385.92K yields net assets of CA$1.24 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read Sky Gold Corp (SKYG) financial obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Sky Gold Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2008–2025)
This chart shows how Sky Gold Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 18 annual periods from 2008 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 76.2%, representing net assets of CA$1.24 Million against total assets of CA$1.62 Million CAD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Sky Gold Corp stock valuation.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Sky Gold Corp (2008–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Sky Gold Corp from 2008 to 2025, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check SKYG strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 51.8% | CA$372.49K | CA$719.39K | CA$346.90K | ▼ -27.9 pp |
| 2024 | 79.7% | CA$820.12K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$209.04K | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2023 | 82.8% | CA$479.35K | CA$579.12K | CA$99.77K | ▼ -14.5 pp |
| 2022 | 97.2% | CA$5.21 Million | CA$5.36 Million | CA$148.38K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2021 | 98.8% | CA$5.67 Million | CA$5.74 Million | CA$70.53K | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2020 | 96.3% | CA$1.47 Million | CA$1.53 Million | CA$55.83K | ▲ +2.5 pp |
| 2019 | 93.9% | CA$2.59 Million | CA$2.76 Million | CA$168.58K | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2018 | 86.4% | CA$2.22 Million | CA$2.57 Million | CA$350.08K | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 2017 | 90.4% | CA$1.42 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$152.09K | ▲ +257.9 pp |
| 2016 | -167.6% | CA$-121.05K | CA$72.25K | CA$193.30K | ▼ -227.5 pp |
| 2015 | 60.0% | CA$566.18K | CA$944.28K | CA$378.11K | ▲ +15959.2 pp |
| 2014 | -15899.2% | CA$-787.01K | CA$4.95K | CA$791.96K | ▼ -15766.8 pp |
| 2013 | -132.5% | CA$-438.44K | CA$331.00K | CA$769.44K | ▼ -209.5 pp |
| 2012 | 77.0% | CA$2.05 Million | CA$2.67 Million | CA$613.57K | ▼ -18.1 pp |
| 2011 | 95.1% | CA$832.24K | CA$875.00K | CA$42.76K | ▲ +12.5 pp |
| 2010 | 82.6% | CA$75.86K | CA$91.88K | CA$16.02K | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2009 | 87.3% | CA$157.63K | CA$180.50K | CA$22.86K | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2008 | 84.9% | CA$61.25K | CA$72.14K | CA$10.89K | — |