Silver Spruce Resources Inc (SSE) — Net Asset Quality Index
Silver Spruce Resources Inc (SSE) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -691.7% as of April 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$67.34K minus total liabilities of CA$533.19K yields net assets of CA$-465.85K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check SSE cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Silver Spruce Resources Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Silver Spruce Resources Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 27 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of April 2025, the index stands at -691.7%, representing net assets of CA$-465.85K against total assets of CA$67.34K CAD. See working capital to net assets of Silver Spruce Resources Inc to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Silver Spruce Resources Inc (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Silver Spruce Resources Inc from 1998 to 2024, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see SSE market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -216.0% | CA$-242.01K | CA$112.06K | CA$354.07K | ▼ -264.0 pp |
| 2023 | 48.0% | CA$197.26K | CA$410.71K | CA$213.45K | ▲ +40.1 pp |
| 2022 | 7.9% | CA$30.57K | CA$385.22K | CA$354.65K | ▼ -70.9 pp |
| 2021 | 78.8% | CA$1.16 Million | CA$1.47 Million | CA$311.83K | ▼ -13.3 pp |
| 2020 | 92.1% | CA$1.31 Million | CA$1.42 Million | CA$111.75K | ▲ +239.0 pp |
| 2019 | -146.8% | CA$-398.48K | CA$271.41K | CA$669.89K | ▼ -131.3 pp |
| 2018 | -15.5% | CA$-161.68K | CA$1.04 Million | CA$1.20 Million | ▼ -37.2 pp |
| 2017 | 21.6% | CA$268.01K | CA$1.24 Million | CA$970.62K | ▲ +147.4 pp |
| 2016 | -125.8% | CA$-209.85K | CA$166.85K | CA$376.70K | ▲ +7838.6 pp |
| 2015 | -7964.3% | CA$-2.37 Million | CA$29.82K | CA$2.40 Million | ▼ -7802.1 pp |
| 2014 | -162.2% | CA$-329.73K | CA$203.25K | CA$532.98K | ▼ -223.3 pp |
| 2013 | 61.0% | CA$583.69K | CA$956.39K | CA$372.71K | ▼ -25.1 pp |
| 2012 | 86.1% | CA$1.82 Million | CA$2.11 Million | CA$293.50K | ▼ -10.6 pp |
| 2011 | 96.8% | CA$5.10 Million | CA$5.27 Million | CA$171.11K | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2010 | 89.3% | CA$3.19 Million | CA$3.57 Million | CA$380.36K | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2009 | 95.4% | CA$6.77 Million | CA$7.10 Million | CA$325.41K | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2008 | 96.3% | CA$15.53 Million | CA$16.12 Million | CA$589.19K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2007 | 92.7% | CA$11.12 Million | CA$11.99 Million | CA$874.66K | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2006 | 96.9% | CA$6.19 Million | CA$6.39 Million | CA$198.86K | ▲ +20.1 pp |
| 2005 | 76.8% | CA$429.73K | CA$559.41K | CA$129.68K | ▲ +22.5 pp |
| 2004 | 54.3% | CA$131.54K | CA$242.09K | CA$110.55K | ▼ -27.4 pp |
| 2003 | 81.8% | CA$135.14K | CA$165.24K | CA$30.10K | ▲ +117.2 pp |
| 2002 | -35.4% | CA$-58.48K | CA$165.31K | CA$223.79K | ▼ -26.4 pp |
| 2001 | -9.0% | CA$-15.06K | CA$166.91K | CA$181.97K | ▼ -71.5 pp |
| 2000 | 62.4% | CA$109.48K | CA$175.32K | CA$65.84K | ▼ -17.8 pp |
| 1999 | 80.3% | CA$160.45K | CA$199.93K | CA$39.48K | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 1998 | 54.1% | CA$115.50K | CA$213.58K | CA$98.08K | — |