Craven House Capital PLC Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Craven House Capital PLC strategic asset allocation index. Craven House Capital PLC (CRV) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 114.6% as of August 2019. Strategic assets (PP&E of $- plus long-term investments of $20.48 Million) total $20.48 Million, measured against net assets of $17.86 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See CRV net asset quality score to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Craven House Capital PLC (2003–2019)
Strategic asset allocation index of Craven House Capital PLC from 2003 to 2019. This chart shows how Craven House Capital PLC's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 12 annual periods from 2003 to 2019. As of August 2019, the index stands at 114.6%, representing strategic assets of $20.48 Million against net assets of $17.86 Million USD. Check Craven House Capital PLC tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Craven House Capital PLC Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2003–2019)
Craven House Capital PLC strategic asset allocation index by year from 2003 to 2019. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Craven House Capital PLC from 2003 to 2019, covering 12 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Craven House Capital PLC (CRV) market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 118.7% | $27.37 Million | $- | $27.37 Million | $23.06 Million | ▲ +10.1 pp |
| 2018 | 108.6% | $26.99 Million | $- | $26.99 Million | $24.86 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2017 | 104.5% | $26.40 Million | $- | $26.40 Million | $25.26 Million | ▲ +21.1 pp |
| 2016 | 83.4% | $8.12 Million | $- | $8.12 Million | $9.73 Million | ▲ +18.6 pp |
| 2015 | 64.8% | $4.67 Million | $- | $4.67 Million | $7.21 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2014 | 65.8% | $6.09 Million | $- | $6.09 Million | $9.27 Million | ▲ +65.7 pp |
| 2012 | 0.0% | $1.00K | $1.00K | $- | $3.59 Million | ▼ -121.9 pp |
| 2007 | 122.0% | $716.00K | $716.00K | $- | $587.01K | ▲ +70.4 pp |
| 2006 | 51.6% | $872.00K | $872.00K | $- | $1.69 Million | ▲ +34.6 pp |
| 2005 | 17.0% | $1.14 Million | $1.14 Million | $- | $6.68 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2004 | 15.1% | $1.17 Million | $1.17 Million | $- | $7.79 Million | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2003 | 22.4% | $1.02 Million | $1.02 Million | $- | $4.54 Million | — |