Conduit Capital Ltd (CND) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Conduit Capital Ltd (CND) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -141.4% as of June 2021. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ZAC41.66 Million) from net assets (ZAC17.25 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See CND working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Conduit Capital Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2005–2021)
This chart shows how Conduit Capital Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2005 to 2021. As of June 2021, the ratio stands at -141.4%, reflecting net assets of ZAC17.25 Million with intangible assets of ZAC41.66 Million ZAC. See CND defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Conduit Capital Ltd (2005–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Conduit Capital Ltd from 2005 to 2021, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CND market cap.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ZAC) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | -141.4% | ZAC17.25 Million | ZAC41.66 Million | ZAC1.41 Billion | ▼ -211.3 pp |
| 2020 | 69.9% | ZAC175.46 Million | ZAC52.86 Million | ZAC1.69 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2019 | 83.7% | ZAC745.83 Million | ZAC121.52 Million | ZAC2.28 Billion | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 2018 | 94.1% | ZAC1.41 Billion | ZAC83.35 Million | ZAC2.41 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | ZAC948.82 Million | ZAC59.33 Million | ZAC1.80 Billion | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2016 | 99.5% | ZAC578.27 Million | ZAC2.85 Million | ZAC1.19 Billion | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2015 | 92.1% | ZAC448.74 Million | ZAC35.25 Million | ZAC1.06 Billion | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 2014 | 99.8% | ZAC431.05 Million | ZAC742.00K | ZAC1.02 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 99.4% | ZAC327.62 Million | ZAC1.98 Million | ZAC1.03 Billion | ▲ +15.5 pp |
| 2012 | 83.9% | ZAC288.30 Million | ZAC46.46 Million | ZAC901.82 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 83.7% | ZAC282.86 Million | ZAC46.09 Million | ZAC817.88 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 82.2% | ZAC259.56 Million | ZAC46.28 Million | ZAC717.61 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 81.2% | ZAC246.51 Million | ZAC46.44 Million | ZAC751.48 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2008 | 79.6% | ZAC228.89 Million | ZAC46.65 Million | ZAC1.12 Billion | ▲ +13.7 pp |
| 2007 | 65.9% | ZAC230.51 Million | ZAC78.55 Million | ZAC1.19 Billion | ▼ -32.2 pp |
| 2006 | 98.1% | ZAC20.09 Million | ZAC381.00K | ZAC27.92 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2005 | 95.9% | ZAC5.91 Million | ZAC240.00K | ZAC8.15 Million | — |