Conduit Capital Ltd (CND) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Conduit Capital Ltd (CND) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -141.4% as of June 2021. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (ZAC41.66 Million) from net assets (ZAC17.25 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See what is Conduit Capital Ltd's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Conduit Capital Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2005–2021)
This chart shows how Conduit Capital Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 17 annual periods from 2005 to 2021. As of June 2021, the ratio stands at -141.4%, reflecting net assets of ZAC17.25 Million with intangible assets of ZAC41.66 Million ZAC. Also explore Conduit Capital Ltd equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Conduit Capital Ltd (2005–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Conduit Capital Ltd from 2005 to 2021, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CND company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (ZAC) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | -141.4% | ZAC17.25 Million | ZAC41.66 Million | ZAC1.41 Billion | ▼ -211.3 pp |
| 2020 | 69.9% | ZAC175.46 Million | ZAC52.86 Million | ZAC1.69 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2019 | 83.7% | ZAC745.83 Million | ZAC121.52 Million | ZAC2.28 Billion | ▼ -10.4 pp |
| 2018 | 94.1% | ZAC1.41 Billion | ZAC83.35 Million | ZAC2.41 Billion | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2017 | 93.7% | ZAC948.82 Million | ZAC59.33 Million | ZAC1.80 Billion | ▼ -5.8 pp |
| 2016 | 99.5% | ZAC578.27 Million | ZAC2.85 Million | ZAC1.19 Billion | ▲ +7.4 pp |
| 2015 | 92.1% | ZAC448.74 Million | ZAC35.25 Million | ZAC1.06 Billion | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 2014 | 99.8% | ZAC431.05 Million | ZAC742.00K | ZAC1.02 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 99.4% | ZAC327.62 Million | ZAC1.98 Million | ZAC1.03 Billion | ▲ +15.5 pp |
| 2012 | 83.9% | ZAC288.30 Million | ZAC46.46 Million | ZAC901.82 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 83.7% | ZAC282.86 Million | ZAC46.09 Million | ZAC817.88 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2010 | 82.2% | ZAC259.56 Million | ZAC46.28 Million | ZAC717.61 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2009 | 81.2% | ZAC246.51 Million | ZAC46.44 Million | ZAC751.48 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2008 | 79.6% | ZAC228.89 Million | ZAC46.65 Million | ZAC1.12 Billion | ▲ +13.7 pp |
| 2007 | 65.9% | ZAC230.51 Million | ZAC78.55 Million | ZAC1.19 Billion | ▼ -32.2 pp |
| 2006 | 98.1% | ZAC20.09 Million | ZAC381.00K | ZAC27.92 Million | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2005 | 95.9% | ZAC5.91 Million | ZAC240.00K | ZAC8.15 Million | — |