Niagen Bioscience, Inc. (NAGE) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Niagen Bioscience, Inc. (NAGE) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 99.7% as of September 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($246.00K) from net assets ($70.68 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See NAGE working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Niagen Bioscience, Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (2007–2024)
This chart shows how Niagen Bioscience, Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 18 annual periods from 2007 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 99.7%, reflecting net assets of $70.68 Million with intangible assets of $246.00K USD. See defensive interval ratio of Niagen Bioscience, Inc. to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Niagen Bioscience, Inc. (2007–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Niagen Bioscience, Inc. from 2007 to 2024, covering 18 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Niagen Bioscience, Inc. worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 99.2% | $46.09 Million | $359.00K | $68.28 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2023 | 98.2% | $28.46 Million | $510.00K | $54.96 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2022 | 97.7% | $28.67 Million | $671.00K | $54.06 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2021 | 97.3% | $31.73 Million | $857.00K | $57.84 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2020 | 93.4% | $16.42 Million | $1.08 Million | $38.36 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2019 | 93.6% | $20.45 Million | $1.31 Million | $40.25 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2018 | 94.3% | $27.18 Million | $1.55 Million | $42.23 Million | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2017 | 96.9% | $53.83 Million | $1.65 Million | $62.72 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2016 | 95.1% | $9.97 Million | $486.00K | $19.75 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 93.3% | $5.27 Million | $354.00K | $18.75 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2014 | 92.6% | $4.00 Million | $296.05K | $11.52 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2013 | 96.4% | $5.67 Million | $201.65K | $8.99 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2012 | 96.6% | $3.99 Million | $136.18K | $9.03 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2011 | 96.1% | $2.56 Million | $100.11K | $6.27 Million | ▲ +1.7 pp |
| 2010 | 94.4% | $4.94 Million | $277.86K | $6.51 Million | ▲ +25.1 pp |
| 2009 | 69.3% | $1.05 Million | $321.49K | $3.57 Million | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 2008 | 74.5% | $1.75 Million | $445.32K | $4.08 Million | ▼ -25.5 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $180.00 | $0.00 | $580.00 | — |